[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Performance improvement with 6d740fb01b9f0f5ea7a82f4d5e458d91940a19e
From: |
Lukáš Doktor |
Subject: |
Re: Performance improvement with 6d740fb01b9f0f5ea7a82f4d5e458d91940a19ee |
Date: |
Fri, 26 May 2023 10:06:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 |
Dne 25. 05. 23 v 17:21 Stefan Hajnoczi napsal(a):
> On Thu, 25 May 2023 at 06:18, Lukáš Doktor <ldoktor@redhat.com> wrote:
>> the perf-ci detected and bisected the 6d740fb - aio-posix: do not nest poll
>> handlers - as a performance improvement when using multiple concurrent jobs
>> and 4k (22%) as well as 1024k (63%) blocks on aarch64 (on a slow rotational
>> disk).
>>
>>
>> https://ldoktor.github.io/tmp/RedHat-virtlab-arm09/v8.0.0/150-improvement.html
>>
>> Based on the commit message I guess it's expected so take this just as a
>> record of an improvement.
>
> The commit was not intended to change performance and I'm not sure why
> it happens!
>
It had and today the x86_64 pipeline finished which shows similar improvement
just not in read but rather in write instead and only for 4k blocks (~40%). For
1024k blocks I can see it scoring a bit better (~1.5%). Reads are too jittery
to really tell anything on that machine. Anyway I have not done any thorough
testing, just a bisection with the most significant setting.
From around the same time I can see a NVMe regression in 4k writes, but first
bisection job showed nothing. I'll increase the range and try again as each job
since that day shows similar drop.
Regards,
Lukáš
> Thanks for letting me know.
>
> Stefan
>
OpenPGP_0x26B362E47FCF22C1.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature