[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 4/5] migration/rdma: It makes no sense to recive that flag wi
|
From: |
Peter Xu |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 4/5] migration/rdma: It makes no sense to recive that flag without RDMA |
|
Date: |
Fri, 26 May 2023 17:15:40 -0400 |
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 01:44:42PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> This could only happen if the source send
> RAM_SAVE_FLAG_HOOK (i.e. rdma) and destination don't have CONFIG_RDMA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Bah, first patch to start reading the master code and it's already merged.
I'll stop here then... :)
--
Peter Xu
- [PATCH 0/5] Migration RDMA cleanup, Juan Quintela, 2023/05/04
- [PATCH 1/5] migration: Make RAM_SAVE_FLAG_HOOK a normal case entry, Juan Quintela, 2023/05/04
- [PATCH 3/5] migration/rdma: We can calculate the rioc from the QEMUFile, Juan Quintela, 2023/05/04
- [PATCH 4/5] migration/rdma: It makes no sense to recive that flag without RDMA, Juan Quintela, 2023/05/04
- [PATCH 2/5] migration/rdma: simplify ram_control_load_hook(), Juan Quintela, 2023/05/04
- [PATCH 5/5] migration/rdma: Check for postcopy sooner, Juan Quintela, 2023/05/04