qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] target/arm: Use x86 intrinsics to implement PMULL.P64


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] target/arm: Use x86 intrinsics to implement PMULL.P64
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 14:00:52 +0100

On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 at 13:33, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> ---
>  host/include/i386/host/cpuinfo.h |  1 +
>  target/arm/tcg/vec_helper.c      | 26 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  util/cpuinfo-i386.c              |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/host/include/i386/host/cpuinfo.h 
> b/host/include/i386/host/cpuinfo.h
> index 073d0a426f31487d..cf4ced844760d28f 100644
> --- a/host/include/i386/host/cpuinfo.h
> +++ b/host/include/i386/host/cpuinfo.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>  #define CPUINFO_ATOMIC_VMOVDQA  (1u << 16)
>  #define CPUINFO_ATOMIC_VMOVDQU  (1u << 17)
>  #define CPUINFO_AES             (1u << 18)
> +#define CPUINFO_PMULL           (1u << 19)
>
>  /* Initialized with a constructor. */
>  extern unsigned cpuinfo;
> diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/vec_helper.c b/target/arm/tcg/vec_helper.c
> index f59d3b26eacf08f8..fb422627588439b3 100644
> --- a/target/arm/tcg/vec_helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/tcg/vec_helper.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,14 @@
>  #include "qemu/int128.h"
>  #include "vec_internal.h"
>
> +#ifdef __x86_64__
> +#include "host/cpuinfo.h"
> +#include <wmmintrin.h>
> +#define TARGET_PMULL  __attribute__((__target__("pclmul")))
> +#else
> +#define TARGET_PMULL
> +#endif
> +
>  /*
>   * Data for expanding active predicate bits to bytes, for byte elements.
>   *
> @@ -2010,12 +2018,28 @@ void HELPER(gvec_pmul_b)(void *vd, void *vn, void 
> *vm, uint32_t desc)
>   * Because of the lanes are not accessed in strict columns,
>   * this probably cannot be turned into a generic helper.
>   */
> -void HELPER(gvec_pmull_q)(void *vd, void *vn, void *vm, uint32_t desc)
> +void TARGET_PMULL HELPER(gvec_pmull_q)(void *vd, void *vn, void *vm, 
> uint32_t desc)
>  {
>      intptr_t i, j, opr_sz = simd_oprsz(desc);
>      intptr_t hi = simd_data(desc);
>      uint64_t *d = vd, *n = vn, *m = vm;
>
> +#ifdef __x86_64__
> +    if (cpuinfo & CPUINFO_PMULL) {
> +       switch (hi) {
> +       case 0:
> +               *(__m128i *)vd = _mm_clmulepi64_si128(*(__m128i *)vm, 
> *(__m128i *)vn, 0x0);
> +               break;
> +       case 1:
> +               *(__m128i *)vd = _mm_clmulepi64_si128(*(__m128i *)vm, 
> *(__m128i *)vn, 0x11);
> +               break;
> +       default:
> +               g_assert_not_reached();
> +       }
> +        return;
> +    }
> +#endif

This needs to cope with the input vectors being more than
just 128 bits wide, I think. Also you probably still
need the clear_tail() to clear any high bits of the register.

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]