[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3] 9pfs: deprecate 'proxy' backend
From: |
Christian Schoenebeck |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3] 9pfs: deprecate 'proxy' backend |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jun 2023 18:44:33 +0200 |
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 5:28:33 PM CEST Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
[...]
> > > I'm fine with deprecating this. In terms of messaging wrt replacements,
> > > we should highlight both the 9p 'local' backend, and virtiofsd as the
> > > two alternatives. The latter is likely the better choice (on linux
> > > hosts) for many.
> >
> > OK, I can add that to the deprecation doc, but you don't want that to be
> > added to all the runtime warnings as well, do you?
>
> I'd suggest we could do mention it briefly as an option at rutime, eg
>
> warn_report("'-virtfs proxy' is deprecated, use '-virtfs local' or virtiofs
> instead");
I asked because with what Greg already suggested, it starts to become a long
runtime message, like:
"'-fsdev proxy' and '-virtfs proxy' are deprecated, use 'local' instead of
'proxy' or virtiofs"
And that's probably still ambiguous, becauses that might suggest people that
they could simply s/-virtfs proxy/-virtfs virtiofs/.
Low care rate on my end though.
Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck
Re: [PATCH v3] 9pfs: deprecate 'proxy' backend, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2023/06/21