qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/6] qemu-img: rebase: stop when reaching EOF of old backing


From: Denis V. Lunev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] qemu-img: rebase: stop when reaching EOF of old backing file
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 20:23:04 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0

On 6/1/23 21:28, Andrey Drobyshev wrote:
In case when we're rebasing within one backing chain, and when target image
is larger than old backing file, bdrv_is_allocated_above() ends up setting
*pnum = 0.  As a result, target offset isn't getting incremented, and we
get stuck in an infinite for loop.  Let's detect this case and proceed
further down the loop body, as the offsets beyond the old backing size need
to be explicitly zeroed.

Signed-off-by: Andrey Drobyshev <andrey.drobyshev@virtuozzo.com>
---
  qemu-img.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/qemu-img.c b/qemu-img.c
index 27f48051b0..78433f3746 100644
--- a/qemu-img.c
+++ b/qemu-img.c
@@ -3801,6 +3801,8 @@ static int img_rebase(int argc, char **argv)
              }
if (prefix_chain_bs) {
+                uint64_t bytes = n;
+
                  /*
                   * If cluster wasn't changed since prefix_chain, we don't need
                   * to take action
@@ -3813,9 +3815,18 @@ static int img_rebase(int argc, char **argv)
                                   strerror(-ret));
                      goto out;
                  }
-                if (!ret) {
+                if (!ret && n) {
                      continue;
                  }
+                if (!n) {
+                    /*
+                     * If we've reached EOF of the old backing, it means that
+                     * offsets beyond the old backing size were read as zeroes.
+                     * Now we will need to explicitly zero the cluster in
+                     * order to preserve that state after the rebase.
+                     */
+                    n = bytes;
+                }
              }
/*
for the clarity:
Reviewed-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]