[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH qemu v3] fdt_load_addr is getting assigned as the result of riscv
From: |
~rlakshmibai |
Subject: |
[PATCH qemu v3] fdt_load_addr is getting assigned as the result of riscv_compute_fdt_addr(), which is an uint64_t. |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Jun 2023 19:20:06 +0530 |
From: Lakshmi Bai Raja Subramanian
<lakshmi.bai.rajasubramanian@bodhicomputing.com>
fdt_load_addr is declared as uint32_t which is not matching with the
return data type of riscv_compute_fdt_addr. Modified fdt_load_addr data type
to uint64_t to match the riscv_compute_fdt_addr() return data type. This fix
also helps in calculating the right fdt address when DRAM is mapped to higher
64-bit address.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Bai Raja Subramanian
<lakshmi.bai.rajasubramanian@bodhicomputing.com>
---
hw/riscv/virt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/riscv/virt.c b/hw/riscv/virt.c
index 95708d890e..c348529ac0 100644
--- a/hw/riscv/virt.c
+++ b/hw/riscv/virt.c
@@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ static void virt_machine_done(Notifier *notifier, void
*data)
target_ulong start_addr = memmap[VIRT_DRAM].base;
target_ulong firmware_end_addr, kernel_start_addr;
const char *firmware_name = riscv_default_firmware_name(&s->soc[0]);
- uint32_t fdt_load_addr;
+ uint64_t fdt_load_addr;
uint64_t kernel_entry = 0;
BlockBackend *pflash_blk0;
--
2.38.5
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [PATCH qemu v3] fdt_load_addr is getting assigned as the result of riscv_compute_fdt_addr(), which is an uint64_t.,
~rlakshmibai <=