qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/1] hw/arm/sbsa-ref: add PCIe node into DT


From: Leif Lindholm
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] hw/arm/sbsa-ref: add PCIe node into DT
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 13:52:49 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0

On 2023-06-27 13:12, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 at 08:52, Marcin Juszkiewicz
<marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org> wrote:

Add PCI Express information into DeviceTree as part of SBSA-REF
versioning.

Trusted Firmware will read it and provide to next firmware level.

Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org>
---
  hw/arm/sbsa-ref.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/arm/sbsa-ref.c b/hw/arm/sbsa-ref.c
index 0639f97dd5..b87d2ee3b2 100644
--- a/hw/arm/sbsa-ref.c
+++ b/hw/arm/sbsa-ref.c
@@ -171,6 +171,25 @@ static uint64_t sbsa_ref_cpu_mp_affinity(SBSAMachineState 
*sms, int idx)
      return arm_cpu_mp_affinity(idx, clustersz);
  }

+static void sbsa_fdt_add_pcie_node(SBSAMachineState *sms)
+{
+    char *nodename;
+
+    nodename = g_strdup_printf("/pcie");
+    qemu_fdt_add_subnode(sms->fdt, nodename);
+    qemu_fdt_setprop_sized_cells(sms->fdt, nodename, "reg",
+                                 2, sbsa_ref_memmap[SBSA_PCIE_ECAM].base,
+                                 2, sbsa_ref_memmap[SBSA_PCIE_ECAM].size,
+                                 2, sbsa_ref_memmap[SBSA_PCIE_PIO].base,
+                                 2, sbsa_ref_memmap[SBSA_PCIE_PIO].size,
+                                 2, sbsa_ref_memmap[SBSA_PCIE_MMIO].base,
+                                 2, sbsa_ref_memmap[SBSA_PCIE_MMIO].size,
+                                 2, sbsa_ref_memmap[SBSA_PCIE_MMIO_HIGH].base,
+                                 2, sbsa_ref_memmap[SBSA_PCIE_MMIO_HIGH].size);
+
+    g_free(nodename);


Why do we need to do this? The firmware should just
know exactly where the PCIE windows are, the same way
it knows where the flash, the UART, the RTC etc etc
all are in the memory map.

That is not automatically true (it was not for at least one SoC I have worked on). In a real system which had these dynamically decided, some coprocessor would program the CMN to route these address ranges to certain offsets within certain components, and that same coprocessor could then provide a mechanism for how TF-A could discover these and provide it to later-stage firmware via SiP SMC calls.

Sticking the information in the DT lets us emulate this without actually emulating the CMN and the coprocessor, and prototype (and verify) the same firmware interfaces for developing i.e. edk2 support.

/
    Leif




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]