Re: [PATCH] gdbstub: Permit reverse step/break to provide stop response

[Matheus Tavares Bernardino]

Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 at 13:19, Matheus Tavares Bernardino 
> <quic_mathbern@quicinc.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ah, it's interesting that [1] doesn't include 'bc' and 'bs' in the list
> > of cmds that may respond with a stop-reply packet:
> >
> >     "The 'C', 'c', 'S', 's', 'vCont', 'vAttach', 'vRun', 'vStopped', and
> >     '?' packets can receive any of the below as a reply."
> >
> > But their definitions at [2] do say the following:
> >
> >     'bc' (and 'bc')
> >     [...]
> >     Reply: See Stop Reply Packets, for the reply specifications.
> >
> > So I guess the list from [1] is not exhaustive. Anyway, thanks for the
> > fix!
> 
> That looks like it's probably a gdb docs bug (forgetting to
> update that list when the bc/bs packets were added); we
> should probably report that to upstream gdb.

Good idea, done: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb/2023-June/050804.html