qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] target/riscv: Check for CF_PARALLEL instead of qemu_tcg_


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] target/riscv: Check for CF_PARALLEL instead of qemu_tcg_mttcg_enabled
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 17:26:59 +0100
User-agent: mu4e 1.11.7; emacs 29.0.92

Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> writes:

> A CPU knows whether MTTCG is enabled or not because it is
> reflected in its TCG flags via the CF_PARALLEL bit.
>
> Suggested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> ---
>  target/riscv/cpu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index 4035fe0e62..4dfa64af6a 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ static void rv64_veyron_v1_cpu_init(Object *obj)
>  
>  static void rv128_base_cpu_init(Object *obj)
>  {
> -    if (qemu_tcg_mttcg_enabled()) {
> +    if (CPU(obj)->tcg_cflags & CF_PARALLEL) {

Hmm have you checked that tcg_cpu_init_cflags() has executed by this point?

>          /* Missing 128-bit aligned atomics */
>          error_report("128-bit RISC-V currently does not work with Multi "
>                       "Threaded TCG. Please use: -accel tcg,thread=single");

Not that we can do anything about it but in linux-user we start with
CF_PARALLEL unset and only set it at the point we spawn a new thread.

-- 
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]