qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [PATCH v3] arm/kvm: Enable support for KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK


From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] arm/kvm: Enable support for KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 07:02:38 +0000


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gavin Shan [mailto:gshan@redhat.com]
> Sent: 31 August 2023 02:43
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>;
> qemu-devel@nongnu.org; qemu-arm@nongnu.org
> Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org; ricarkol@google.com; Jonathan Cameron
> <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Linuxarm
> <linuxarm@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm/kvm: Enable support for
> KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE
> 
> Hi Shameer,
> 
> On 8/30/23 21:48, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > Now that we have Eager Page Split support added for ARM in the kernel,
> > enable it in Qemu. This adds,
> >   -eager-split-size to -accel sub-options to set the eager page split chunk
> size.
> >   -enable KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE.
> >
> > The chunk size specifies how many pages to break at a time, using a
> > single allocation. Bigger the chunk size, more pages need to be
> > allocated ahead of time.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum
> <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20230815092709.1290-1-shameerali.kol
> othum.thodi@huawei.com/
> >     -Addressed comments from Gavin(Thanks).
> > RFC v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20230725150002.621-1-shameerali.kolo
> thum.thodi@huawei.com/
> >    -Updated qemu-options.hx with description
> >    -Addressed review comments from Peter and Gavin(Thanks).
> > ---
> >   accel/kvm/kvm-all.c      |  1 +
> >   include/sysemu/kvm_int.h |  1 +
> >   qemu-options.hx          | 15 +++++++++
> >   target/arm/kvm.c         | 68
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   4 files changed, 85 insertions(+)
> >
> 
> One more question below. Please check if it's worthy to be addressed in v4,
> needed
> to resolved other comments. Otherwise, it looks fine to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>

Thanks. I will send out a v4 with the above tag and the below suggestion to 
get rid of the kvm_arm_eager_split_size_valid().

Shameer.

> 
> > diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> > index 2ba7521695..ff1578bb32 100644
> > --- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> > +++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
> > @@ -3763,6 +3763,7 @@ static void kvm_accel_instance_init(Object *obj)
> >       /* KVM dirty ring is by default off */
> >       s->kvm_dirty_ring_size = 0;
> >       s->kvm_dirty_ring_with_bitmap = false;
> > +    s->kvm_eager_split_size = 0;
> >       s->notify_vmexit = NOTIFY_VMEXIT_OPTION_RUN;
> >       s->notify_window = 0;
> >       s->xen_version = 0;
> > diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm_int.h b/include/sysemu/kvm_int.h
> > index 511b42bde5..a5b9122cb8 100644
> > --- a/include/sysemu/kvm_int.h
> > +++ b/include/sysemu/kvm_int.h
> > @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ struct KVMState
> >       uint64_t kvm_dirty_ring_bytes;  /* Size of the per-vcpu dirty ring
> */
> >       uint32_t kvm_dirty_ring_size;   /* Number of dirty GFNs per ring
> */
> >       bool kvm_dirty_ring_with_bitmap;
> > +    uint64_t kvm_eager_split_size;  /* Eager Page Splitting chunk size */
> >       struct KVMDirtyRingReaper reaper;
> >       NotifyVmexitOption notify_vmexit;
> >       uint32_t notify_window;
> > diff --git a/qemu-options.hx b/qemu-options.hx
> > index 29b98c3d4c..2e70704ee8 100644
> > --- a/qemu-options.hx
> > +++ b/qemu-options.hx
> > @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ DEF("accel", HAS_ARG, QEMU_OPTION_accel,
> >       "                split-wx=on|off (enable TCG split w^x
> mapping)\n"
> >       "                tb-size=n (TCG translation block cache size)\n"
> >       "                dirty-ring-size=n (KVM dirty ring GFN count,
> default 0)\n"
> > +    "                eager-split-size=n (KVM Eager Page Split chunk
> size, default 0, disabled. ARM only)\n"
> >       "
> notify-vmexit=run|internal-error|disable,notify-window=n (enable notify VM
> exit and set notify window, x86 only)\n"
> >       "                thread=single|multi (enable multi-threaded
> TCG)\n", QEMU_ARCH_ALL)
> >   SRST
> > @@ -244,6 +245,20 @@ SRST
> >           is disabled (dirty-ring-size=0).  When enabled, KVM will
> instead
> >           record dirty pages in a bitmap.
> >
> > +    ``eager-split-size=n``
> > +        KVM implements dirty page logging at the PAGE_SIZE granularity
> and
> > +        enabling dirty-logging on a huge-page requires breaking it into
> > +        PAGE_SIZE pages in the first place. KVM on ARM does this
> splitting
> > +        lazily by default. There are performance benefits in doing
> huge-page
> > +        split eagerly, especially in situations where TLBI costs associated
> > +        with break-before-make sequences are considerable and also if
> guest
> > +        workloads are read intensive. The size here specifies how many
> pages
> > +        to break at a time and needs to be a valid block size which is
> > +        1GB/2MB/4KB, 32MB/16KB and 512MB/64KB for
> 4KB/16KB/64KB PAGE_SIZE
> > +        respectively. Be wary of specifying a higher size as it will have 
> > an
> > +        impact on the memory. By default, this feature is disabled
> > +        (eager-split-size=0).
> > +
> >       ``notify-vmexit=run|internal-error|disable,notify-window=n``
> >           Enables or disables notify VM exit support on x86 host and
> specify
> >           the corresponding notify window to trigger the VM exit if
> enabled.
> > diff --git a/target/arm/kvm.c b/target/arm/kvm.c
> > index 23aeb09949..28d81ca790 100644
> > --- a/target/arm/kvm.c
> > +++ b/target/arm/kvm.c
> > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> >   #include "exec/address-spaces.h"
> >   #include "hw/boards.h"
> >   #include "hw/irq.h"
> > +#include "qapi/visitor.h"
> >   #include "qemu/log.h"
> >
> >   const KVMCapabilityInfo kvm_arch_required_capabilities[] = {
> > @@ -247,6 +248,12 @@ int
> kvm_arm_get_max_vm_ipa_size(MachineState *ms, bool *fixed_ipa)
> >       return ret > 0 ? ret : 40;
> >   }
> >
> > +static inline bool kvm_arm_eager_split_size_valid(uint64_t req_size,
> > +                                                  uint32_t sizes)
> > +{
> > +    return req_size & sizes;
> > +}
> > +
> >   int kvm_arch_get_default_type(MachineState *ms)
> >   {
> >       bool fixed_ipa;
> > @@ -287,6 +294,27 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState
> *s)
> >           }
> >       }
> >
> > +    if (s->kvm_eager_split_size) {
> > +        uint32_t sizes;
> > +
> > +        sizes = kvm_vm_check_extension(s,
> KVM_CAP_ARM_SUPPORTED_BLOCK_SIZES);
> > +        if (!sizes) {
> > +            s->kvm_eager_split_size = 0;
> > +            warn_report("Eager Page Split support not available");
> > +        } else if
> (!kvm_arm_eager_split_size_valid(s->kvm_eager_split_size,
> > +                                                   sizes)) {
> > +            error_report("Eager Page Split requested chunk size not
> valid");
> > +            ret = -EINVAL;
> > +        } else {
> > +            ret = kvm_vm_enable_cap(s,
> KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE, 0,
> > +                                    s->kvm_eager_split_size);
> > +            if (ret < 0) {
> > +                error_report("Enabling of Eager Page Split failed: %s",
> > +                             strerror(-ret));
> > +            }
> > +        }
> > +    }
> > +
> >       kvm_arm_init_debug(s);
> >
> >       return ret;
> 
> The function kvm_arm_eager_split_size_valid() was suggested by Peter if I'm
> correct.
> However, it seems we needn't it any more since it's called for once. Why not
> simply to
> have something like below? The detailed error message can help to explain
> why we
> need the condition of (s->kvm_eager_split_size & sizes) here.
> 
>      } else if (s->kvm_eager_split_size & sizes) {
>          error_report("Unsupported Eager Page Split chunk size 0x%lx by
> 0x%x",
>                       s->kvm_eager_split_size, sizes);
>          ret = -EINVAL;
>      }
> 
> > @@ -1069,6 +1097,46 @@ bool
> kvm_arch_cpu_check_are_resettable(void)
> >       return true;
> >   }
> >
> > +static void kvm_arch_get_eager_split_size(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
> > +                                          const char *name, void
> *opaque,
> > +                                          Error **errp)
> > +{
> > +    KVMState *s = KVM_STATE(obj);
> > +    uint64_t value = s->kvm_eager_split_size;
> > +
> > +    visit_type_size(v, name, &value, errp);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void kvm_arch_set_eager_split_size(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
> > +                                          const char *name, void
> *opaque,
> > +                                          Error **errp)
> > +{
> > +    KVMState *s = KVM_STATE(obj);
> > +    uint64_t value;
> > +
> > +    if (s->fd != -1) {
> > +        error_setg(errp, "Unable to set early-split-size after KVM has
> been initialized");
> > +        return;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    if (!visit_type_size(v, name, &value, errp)) {
> > +        return;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    if (value && !is_power_of_2(value)) {
> > +        error_setg(errp, "early-split-size must be a power of two");
> > +        return;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    s->kvm_eager_split_size = value;
> > +}
> > +
> >   void kvm_arch_accel_class_init(ObjectClass *oc)
> >   {
> > +    object_class_property_add(oc, "eager-split-size", "size",
> > +                              kvm_arch_get_eager_split_size,
> > +                              kvm_arch_set_eager_split_size, NULL,
> NULL);
> > +
> > +    object_class_property_set_description(oc, "eager-split-size",
> > +        "Eager Page Split chunk size for hugepages. (default: 0,
> disabled)");
> >   }
> 
> Thanks,
> Gavin


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]