qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH qemu 2/2] dump: Only use the makedumpfile flattened format wh


From: Marc-André Lureau
Subject: Re: [PATCH qemu 2/2] dump: Only use the makedumpfile flattened format when necessary
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 10:34:04 +0400

Hi

On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 2:03 PM Marc-André Lureau
<marcandre.lureau@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 4:31 AM Stephen Brennan
> <stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com> writes:
> > > Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com> writes:
> > >> I am a bit reluctant to change the dump format by default. But since the
> > >> flatten format is more "complicated" than the "normal" format, perhaps we
> > >> can assume all users will handle it.
> > >>
> > >> The change is probably late for 8.1 though..
> > >
> > > Thank you for your review and testing!
> > >
> > > I totally understand the concern about making the change by default. I
> > > do believe that nobody should notice too much because the normal format
> > > should be easier to work with, and more broadly compatible. I don't know
> > > of any tool which deals with the flattened format that can't handle the
> > > normal format, except for "makedumpfile -R" itself.
> > >
> > > If it's a blocker, I can go ahead and add a new flag to the command to
> > > enable the behavior. However there are a few good justifications not to
> > > add a new flag. I think it's going to be difficult to explain the
> > > difference between the two formats in documentation, as the
> > > implementation of the formats is a bit "into the weeds". The libvirt API
> > > also specifies each format separately (kdump-zlib, kdump-lzo,
> > > kdump-snappy) and so adding several new options there would be
> > > unfortunate for end-users as well.
> > >
> > > At the end of the day, it's your judgment call, and I'll implement it
> > > how you prefer.
> >
> > I just wanted to check back on this to clarify the next step. Are you
> > satisfied with this and waiting to apply it until the right time? Or
> > would you prefer me to send a new version making this opt-in?
> >
>
> Nobody seems to raise concerns. If it would be just me, I would change
> it. But we should rather be safe, so let's make it this opt-in please.
>
>

Alex, Daniel, Thomas .. Do you have an opinion on changing the dump format?

Stephen, do you have a new version of the patches to make it opt-in?

thanks



-- 
Marc-André Lureau



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]