[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [PATCH v1 0/4] vfio: report NUMA nodes for device memory
From: |
Ankit Agrawal |
Subject: |
RE: [PATCH v1 0/4] vfio: report NUMA nodes for device memory |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Sep 2023 08:11:14 +0000 |
> >>
> >> Typically, a command line for a virt machine with NUMA nodes would
> >> look like :
> >>
> >> -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram-node0,size=1G \
> >> -numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=ram-node0 \
> >> -object memory-backend-ram,id=ram-node1,size=1G \
> >> -numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=0-3,memdev=ram-node1
> >>
> >> which defines 2 nodes, one with memory and all CPUs and a second with
> >> only memory.
> >>
> >> # numactl -H
> >> available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> >> node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3
> >> node 0 size: 1003 MB
> >> node 0 free: 734 MB
> >> node 1 cpus:
> >> node 1 size: 975 MB
> >> node 1 free: 968 MB
> >> node distances:
> >> node 0 1
> >> 0: 10 20
> >> 1: 20 10
> >>
> >>
> >> Could it be a new type of host memory backend ? Have you considered
> >> this approach ?
> >
> > Good idea. Fundamentally the device should not be creating NUMA
> > nodes, the VM should be configured with NUMA nodes and the device
> > memory associated with those nodes.
>
> +1. That would also make it fly with DIMMs and virtio-mem, where you
> would want NUMA-less nodes ass well (imagine passing CXL memory to a VM
> using virtio-mem).
>
We actually do not add the device memory on the host, instead
map it into the Qemu VMA using remap_pfn_range(). Please checkout the
mmap function in vfio-pci variant driver code managing the device.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230915025415.6762-1-ankita@nvidia.com/
And I think host memory backend would need memory that is added on the
host.
Moreover since we want to passthrough the entire device memory, the
-object memory-backend-ram would have to be passed a size that is equal
to the device memory. I wonder if that would be too much of a trouble
for an admin (or libvirt) triggering the Qemu process.
Both these items are avoided by exposing the device memory as BAR as in the
current implementation (referenced above) since it lets Qemu to naturally
discover the device memory region and do mmap.
- Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] vfio: new command line params for device memory NUMA nodes, (continued)
[PATCH v1 2/4] vfio: assign default values to node params, ankita, 2023/09/14
[PATCH v1 4/4] acpi/gpex: patch guest DSDT for dev mem information, ankita, 2023/09/14
Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] vfio: report NUMA nodes for device memory, Cédric Le Goater, 2023/09/15
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] vfio: report NUMA nodes for device memory, Alex Williamson, 2023/09/15
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] vfio: report NUMA nodes for device memory, David Hildenbrand, 2023/09/15
- RE: [PATCH v1 0/4] vfio: report NUMA nodes for device memory,
Ankit Agrawal <=
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] vfio: report NUMA nodes for device memory, David Hildenbrand, 2023/09/22
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] vfio: report NUMA nodes for device memory, Ankit Agrawal, 2023/09/26
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] vfio: report NUMA nodes for device memory, David Hildenbrand, 2023/09/26
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] vfio: report NUMA nodes for device memory, Alex Williamson, 2023/09/26
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] vfio: report NUMA nodes for device memory, Ankit Agrawal, 2023/09/27
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] vfio: report NUMA nodes for device memory, Jonathan Cameron, 2023/09/27
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] vfio: report NUMA nodes for device memory, Jason Gunthorpe, 2023/09/27
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] vfio: report NUMA nodes for device memory, Alex Williamson, 2023/09/27
- RE: [PATCH v1 0/4] vfio: report NUMA nodes for device memory, Vikram Sethi, 2023/09/27
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] vfio: report NUMA nodes for device memory, Jason Gunthorpe, 2023/09/27