[PULL 49/56] seccomp: avoid shadowing of 'action' variable

[Markus Armbruster]

From: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>

This is confusing as one 'action' variable is used for storing
a SCMP_ enum value, while the other 'action' variable is used
for storing a SECCOMP_ enum value.

Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20230922160644.438631-3-berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
---
 softmmu/qemu-seccomp.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/softmmu/qemu-seccomp.c b/softmmu/qemu-seccomp.c
index d66a2a1226..4d7439e7f7 100644
--- a/softmmu/qemu-seccomp.c
+++ b/softmmu/qemu-seccomp.c
@@ -283,9 +283,9 @@ static uint32_t qemu_seccomp_update_action(uint32_t action)
     if (action == SCMP_ACT_TRAP) {
         static int kill_process = -1;
         if (kill_process == -1) {
-            uint32_t action = SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS;
+            uint32_t testaction = SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS;
 
-            if (qemu_seccomp(SECCOMP_GET_ACTION_AVAIL, 0, &action) == 0) {
+            if (qemu_seccomp(SECCOMP_GET_ACTION_AVAIL, 0, &testaction) == 0) {
                 kill_process = 1;
             } else {
                 kill_process = 0;
-- 
2.41.0