[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Which qemu change corresponds to RedHat bug 1655408
From: |
Jakob Bohm |
Subject: |
Which qemu change corresponds to RedHat bug 1655408 |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Oct 2020 18:32:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1 |
Red Hat bugzilla bug 1655408 against
qemu is listed by Red Hat as fixed in
April 2019, but I cannot find the corresponding change on
qemu.org (the
Changelog in the wiki is not a traditional changelog and doesn't
cover
bugfix releases such as 5.0.1, the git commit log is too
detailed to
search, the Red Hat bugzilla and security advisory pages do not
link
red hat bugs back to upstream (launchpad) bugs or git changes.
Here is the bug title (which also affects my Debian packaged
qemu 5.0):
VM can not boot up due to "Failed to lock byte
100" if cdrom has been
mounted on the host
Further observation:
The basic problem is that qemu-system refuses to start
with the error
message "Failed to lock byte 100" when -drive points to a
read-only
ISO file. For the reporter of the Red Hat bug, that was a
mount-induced
read-only condition, in my case it is an NFS mount of a
read-only
directory.
The error message itself seams meaningless, as there is
no particular
reason to request file locks on a read-only raw disk image.
my qemu-system-x86_64 invocation contains the option (on one
line):
-drive if=none,id=drive-ide0-1-0,readonly=on,
file=/mnt/someshare/path/gparted-live-1.1.0-5-amd64.iso,format=raw
Enjoy
Jakob
--
Jakob Bohm, CIO, Partner, WiseMo A/S. https://www.wisemo.com
Transformervej 29, 2860 Søborg, Denmark. Direct +45 31 13 16 10
This public discussion message is non-binding and may contain errors.
WiseMo - Remote Service Management for PCs, Phones and Embedded
- Which qemu change corresponds to RedHat bug 1655408,
Jakob Bohm <=
- Re: Which qemu change corresponds to RedHat bug 1655408, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/10/08
- Re: Which qemu change corresponds to RedHat bug 1655408, Jakob Bohm, 2020/10/08
- Re: Which qemu change corresponds to RedHat bug 1655408, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/10/08
- Re: Which qemu change corresponds to RedHat bug 1655408, Max Reitz, 2020/10/09
- Re: Which qemu change corresponds to RedHat bug 1655408, Jakob Bohm, 2020/10/09
- Re: Which qemu change corresponds to RedHat bug 1655408, Max Reitz, 2020/10/09
- Re: Which qemu change corresponds to RedHat bug 1655408, Jakob Bohm, 2020/10/09
- Re: Which qemu change corresponds to RedHat bug 1655408, Max Reitz, 2020/10/12
- Re: Which qemu change corresponds to RedHat bug 1655408, Max Reitz, 2020/10/12
- Re: Which qemu change corresponds to RedHat bug 1655408, Jakob Bohm, 2020/10/12