Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] target-ppc: Handle ibm, nmi-register RTAS call

[Alexander Graf]

On 28.08.14 15:06, Tom Musta wrote:
> On 8/28/2014 3:37 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28.08.14 08:38, Aravinda Prasad wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday 27 August 2014 04:07 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 25.08.14 15:45, Aravinda Prasad wrote:
>>>>> This patch adds FWNMI support in qemu for powerKVM
>>>>> guests by handling the ibm,nmi-register rtas call.
>>>>> Whenever OS issues ibm,nmi-register RTAS call, the
>>>>> machine check notification address is saved and the
>>>>> machine check interrupt vector 0x200 is patched to
>>>>> issue a private hcall.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Aravinda Prasad <address@hidden>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c    |   91 
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  include/hw/ppc/spapr.h |    8 ++++
>>>>>  2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
>>>>> index 02ddbf9..1135d2b 100644
>>>>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
>>>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
>>>>> @@ -277,6 +277,91 @@ static void rtas_ibm_set_system_parameter(PowerPCCPU 
>>>>> *cpu,
>>>>>      rtas_st(rets, 0, ret);
>>>>>  }
>>>>>  
>>>>> +static void rtas_ibm_nmi_register(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>>>>> +                                  sPAPREnvironment *spapr,
>>>>> +                                  uint32_t token, uint32_t nargs,
>>>>> +                                  target_ulong args,
>>>>> +                                  uint32_t nret, target_ulong rets)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +    int i;
>>>>> +    uint32_t branch_inst = 0x48000002;
>>>>> +    target_ulong guest_machine_check_addr;
>>>>> +    PowerPCCPUClass *pcc = POWERPC_CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
>>>>> +    /*
>>>>> +     * Trampoline saves r3 in sprg2 and issues private hcall
>>>>> +     * to request qemu to build error log. QEMU builds the
>>>>> +     * error log, copies to rtas-blob and returns the address.
>>>>> +     * The initial 16 bytes in rtas-blob consists of saved srr0
>>>>> +     * and srr1 which we restore and pass on the actual error
>>>>> +     * log address to OS handled mcachine check notification
>>>>> +     * routine
>>>>> +     */
>>>>> +    uint32_t trampoline[] = {
>>>>> +        0x7c7243a6,    /* mtspr   SPRN_SPRG2,r3 */
>>>>> +        0x38600000,    /* li      r3,0   */
>>>>> +        /* 0xf004 is the KVMPPC_H_REPORT_ERR private HCALL */
>>>>> +        0x6063f004,    /* ori     r3,r3,f004  */
>>>>> +        /* Issue H_CALL */
>>>>> +        0x44000022,    /*  sc      1     */
>>>>
>>>> So up to here we're saving r3 in SPRG2 (how do we know that we can
>>>> clobber it?) and call our special hypercall.
>>>>
>>>> But what does all the cruft below here do?
>>>
>>> The saved r3 in SPRG2 is consumed in KVMPPC_H_REPORT_ERR hcall, hence we
>>> can clobber SPRG2 after hcall returns. I have included a comment in
>>> patch 3/5 while building error log. I think better I add one here as well.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> +        0x7c9243a6,    /* mtspr r4 sprg2 */
>>>>
>>>> Apart from th fact that your order is wrong, this destroys the value of
>>>> r3 that we saved above again.
>>>
>>> SPRG2 is saved inside hcall and hence we don't need SPRG2 further after
>>> KVMPPC_H_REPORT_ERR hcall returns.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> +        0xe8830000,    /* ld r4, 0(r3) */
>>>>> +        0x7c9a03a6,    /* mtspr r4, srr0 */
>>>>> +        0xe8830008,    /* ld r4, 8(r3) */
>>>>> +        0x7c9b03a6,    /* mtspr r4, srr1 */
>>>>
>>>> Can't we just set srr0 and srr1 directly?
>>>
>>> I checked for instructions in ISA which set srr0/1 directly given an
>>> address, but could not find any such instructions.
>>
>> I mean from QEMU :).
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> +        0x38630010,    /* addi r3,r3,16 */
>>>>> +        0x7c9242a6,    /* mfspr r4 sprg2 */
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> +        0x48000002,    /* Branch to address registered
>>>>> +                        * by OS. The branch address is
>>>>> +                        * patched below */
>>>>> +        0x48000000,    /* b . */
>>>>> +    };
>>>>> +    int total_inst = sizeof(trampoline) / sizeof(uint32_t);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    /* Store the system reset and machine check address */
>>>>> +    guest_machine_check_addr = rtas_ld(args, 1);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    /* Safety Check */
>>>>> +    if (sizeof(trampoline) >= MC_INTERRUPT_VECTOR_SIZE) {
>>>>> +        fprintf(stderr, "Unable to register ibm,nmi_register: "
>>>>> +                "Trampoline size exceeded\n");
>>>>> +        rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_NOT_SUPPORTED);
>>>>> +        return;
>>>>> +    }
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    /*
>>>>> +     * Update the branch instruction in trampoline with the absolute
>>>>> +     * machine check address requested by OS
>>>>> +     */
>>>>> +    branch_inst |= guest_machine_check_addr;
>>>>
>>>> Does this even work? You're creating a relative branch here.
>>>
>>> We do an absolute branch here. guest_machine_check_addr contains the
>>> physical address of machine check handler. We update the branch
>>> instruction operand to do an absolute branch to this physical address.
>>
>> Where? I don't see the absolute bit anywhere.
>>
> 
> Alex:
> 
> It is here:
> 
> +static void rtas_ibm_nmi_register(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> +                                  sPAPREnvironment *spapr,
> +                                  uint32_t token, uint32_t nargs,
> +                                  target_ulong args,
> +                                  uint32_t nret, target_ulong rets)
> +{
> +    int i;
> +    uint32_t branch_inst = 0x48000002;

Ah, I was looking inside of the instruction stream, sorry :).


Alex