[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/3] linux-headers: Add eeh.h
From: |
Gavin Shan |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/3] linux-headers: Add eeh.h |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Aug 2015 11:10:06 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:42:59AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:30:37AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:00:35PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> >On 08/11/2015 07:11 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >>On 10 August 2015 at 08:13, Gavin Shan <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >>>The header file was introduced by following Linux upstream commits:
>> >>>
>> >>> commit ed3e81f ("powerpc/eeh: Move PE state constants around")
>> >>> commit ec33d36 ("powerpc/eeh: Introduce eeh_pe_inject_err()")
>> >>>
>> >>>Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <address@hidden>
>> >>>---
>> >>> linux-headers/asm-powerpc/eeh.h | 56
>> >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
>> >>> create mode 100644 linux-headers/asm-powerpc/eeh.h
>> >>
>> >>Shouldn't this be added by updating scripts/update-linux-headers.sh
>> >>and then doing a plain "synchronize headers against kernel version $X" ?
>> >
>> >
>> >I also thought this is the protocol but then I looked into the git history
>> >and discovered this is not always the case :)
>> >
>> >
>>
>> So should I use scripts/update-linux-headers.sh or what I had is
>> fine?
>
>Please use update-linux-headers.sh - and make sure you also update the
>script itself (if necessary) so it will pull in future updates to
>eeh.h
>
Sure, thanks, David. It will be covered in next revision.
Thanks,
Gavin
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v4 3/3] sPAPR: Support RTAS call ibm,errinjct, Gavin Shan, 2015/08/10
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v4 2/3] sPAPR: Support RTAS call ibm, {open, close}-errinjct, Gavin Shan, 2015/08/10