[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 2/2] kvm: check KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS with kvm_vm_check_
From: |
Greg Kurz |
Subject: |
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 2/2] kvm: check KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS with kvm_vm_check_extension() |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Sep 2017 18:01:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
StGit/0.17.1-46-g6855-dirty |
On a modern server-class ppc host with the following CPU topology:
Architecture: ppc64le
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 32
On-line CPU(s) list: 0,8,16,24
Off-line CPU(s) list: 1-7,9-15,17-23,25-31
Thread(s) per core: 1
If both KVM PR and KVM HV loaded and we pass:
-machine pseries,accel=kvm,kvm-type=PR -smp 8
We expect QEMU to warn that this exceeds the number of online CPUs:
Warning: Number of SMP cpus requested (8) exceeds the recommended
cpus supported by KVM (4)
Warning: Number of hotpluggable cpus requested (8) exceeds the
recommended cpus supported by KVM (4)
but nothing is printed...
This happens because on ppc the KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS capability is VM
specific ndreally depends on the KVM type, but we currently use it
as a global capability. And KVM returns a fallback value based on
KVM HV being present. Maybe KVM on POWER shouldn't presume anything
as long as it doesn't have a VM, but in all cases, we should call
KVM_CREATE_VM first and use KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS as a VM capability.
This patch hence changes kvm_recommended_vcpus() accordingly and
moves the sanity checking of smp_cpus after the VM creation.
It is okay for the other archs that also implement KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS,
ie, mips, s390, x86 and arm, because they don't depend on the VM
being created or not.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
---
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
index 4d96c1fee9fe..b81d373bc5f9 100644
--- a/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
+++ b/accel/kvm/kvm-all.c
@@ -1441,7 +1441,7 @@ static void kvm_irqchip_create(MachineState *machine,
KVMState *s)
*/
static int kvm_recommended_vcpus(KVMState *s)
{
- int ret = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS);
+ int ret = kvm_vm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS);
return (ret) ? ret : 4;
}
@@ -1531,26 +1531,6 @@ static int kvm_init(MachineState *ms)
s->nr_slots = 32;
}
- /* check the vcpu limits */
- soft_vcpus_limit = kvm_recommended_vcpus(s);
- hard_vcpus_limit = kvm_max_vcpus(s);
-
- while (nc->name) {
- if (nc->num > soft_vcpus_limit) {
- warn_report("Number of %s cpus requested (%d) exceeds "
- "the recommended cpus supported by KVM (%d)",
- nc->name, nc->num, soft_vcpus_limit);
-
- if (nc->num > hard_vcpus_limit) {
- fprintf(stderr, "Number of %s cpus requested (%d) exceeds "
- "the maximum cpus supported by KVM (%d)\n",
- nc->name, nc->num, hard_vcpus_limit);
- exit(1);
- }
- }
- nc++;
- }
-
kvm_type = qemu_opt_get(qemu_get_machine_opts(), "kvm-type");
if (mc->kvm_type) {
type = mc->kvm_type(kvm_type);
@@ -1585,6 +1565,27 @@ static int kvm_init(MachineState *ms)
}
s->vmfd = ret;
+
+ /* check the vcpu limits */
+ soft_vcpus_limit = kvm_recommended_vcpus(s);
+ hard_vcpus_limit = kvm_max_vcpus(s);
+
+ while (nc->name) {
+ if (nc->num > soft_vcpus_limit) {
+ warn_report("Number of %s cpus requested (%d) exceeds "
+ "the recommended cpus supported by KVM (%d)",
+ nc->name, nc->num, soft_vcpus_limit);
+
+ if (nc->num > hard_vcpus_limit) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Number of %s cpus requested (%d) exceeds "
+ "the maximum cpus supported by KVM (%d)\n",
+ nc->name, nc->num, hard_vcpus_limit);
+ exit(1);
+ }
+ }
+ nc++;
+ }
+
missing_cap = kvm_check_extension_list(s, kvm_required_capabilites);
if (!missing_cap) {
missing_cap =