[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 13/24] ppc: spapr: define core types statically
From: |
Greg Kurz |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 13/24] ppc: spapr: define core types statically |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Oct 2017 17:20:51 +0200 |
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 16:58:39 +0200
Igor Mammedov <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 15:10:30 +0200
> Greg Kurz <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 09:29:46 +0200
> > Greg Kurz <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 21:51:00 +0200
> > > Igor Mammedov <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >
> > > > spapr core type definition doesn't have any fields that
> > > > require it to be defined at runtime. So replace code
> > > > that fills in TypeInfo at runtime with static TypeInfo
> > > > array that does the same at complie time.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> > > > ---
> > > > v2:
> > > > - fix rebase conflict: add newly added power9_v2 core
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
> > >
> >
> > Oops, this patch causes a regression when you try to pass a sPAPR core to
> > a non-pseries machine.
> >
> > Without this patch:
> >
> > $ ppc64-softmmu/qemu-system-ppc64 -M none -device host-spapr-cpu-core
> > qemu-system-ppc64: -device host-spapr-cpu-core:
> > 'host-spapr-cpu-core' is not a valid device model name
> >
> > With this patch:
> >
> > $ ppc64-softmmu/qemu-system-ppc64 -M none -device host-spapr-cpu-core
> > **
> > ERROR:qom/object.c:217:object_type_get_instance_size:
> > assertion failed: (type != NULL)
> > Aborted
> there shouldn't be type host-spapr-cpu-core with this patch since you don't
> have -enable-kvm on CLI
> maybe you are talking about
> [PATCH v2 15/24] ppc: spapr: register 'host' core type along with the
> rest of core types
>
Oops you're right, I replied to the wrong mail... of course, I meant the
following commit in David's staging tree:
https://github.com/dgibson/qemu/commit/c18165144076cef0c17206f5231cf9787c944037
>
> [...]
>
>
> > I think that this patch should be reverted from David's staging tree for
> > now, I'll
> > repost it when I have a proposal for the host CPU.
> let me find ppc host and look into it before reverting,
> maybe there is easier way around this 'very corner' case.
>
Matter of personal opinion. It's not my call anyway :)
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > --
> > Greg
> >
> > > > include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h | 2 +
> > > > hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 87
> > > > +++++++++++++----------------------------
> > > > 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h
> > > > b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h
> > > > index 93051e9..66dcf52 100644
> > > > --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h
> > > > +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h
> > > > @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
> > > > #define SPAPR_CPU_CORE_GET_CLASS(obj) \
> > > > OBJECT_GET_CLASS(sPAPRCPUCoreClass, (obj), TYPE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE)
> > > >
> > > > +#define SPAPR_CPU_CORE_TYPE_NAME(model) model "-" TYPE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE
> > > > +
> > > > typedef struct sPAPRCPUCore {
> > > > /*< private >*/
> > > > CPUCore parent_obj;
> > > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> > > > index b6610dd..550d320 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> > > > @@ -217,37 +217,6 @@ err:
> > > > error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -static const char *spapr_core_models[] = {
> > > > - /* 970 */
> > > > - "970_v2.2",
> > > > -
> > > > - /* 970MP variants */
> > > > - "970mp_v1.0",
> > > > - "970mp_v1.1",
> > > > -
> > > > - /* POWER5+ */
> > > > - "power5+_v2.1",
> > > > -
> > > > - /* POWER7 */
> > > > - "power7_v2.3",
> > > > -
> > > > - /* POWER7+ */
> > > > - "power7+_v2.1",
> > > > -
> > > > - /* POWER8 */
> > > > - "power8_v2.0",
> > > > -
> > > > - /* POWER8E */
> > > > - "power8e_v2.1",
> > > > -
> > > > - /* POWER8NVL */
> > > > - "power8nvl_v1.0",
> > > > -
> > > > - /* POWER9 */
> > > > - "power9_v1.0",
> > > > - "power9_v2.0",
> > > > -};
> > > > -
> > > > static Property spapr_cpu_core_properties[] = {
> > > > DEFINE_PROP_INT32("node-id", sPAPRCPUCore, node_id,
> > > > CPU_UNSET_NUMA_NODE_ID),
> > > > DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST()
> > > > @@ -265,33 +234,33 @@ void spapr_cpu_core_class_init(ObjectClass *oc,
> > > > void *data)
> > > > g_assert(scc->cpu_class);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -static const TypeInfo spapr_cpu_core_type_info = {
> > > > - .name = TYPE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE,
> > > > - .parent = TYPE_CPU_CORE,
> > > > - .abstract = true,
> > > > - .instance_size = sizeof(sPAPRCPUCore),
> > > > - .class_size = sizeof(sPAPRCPUCoreClass),
> > > > -};
> > > > -
> > > > -static void spapr_cpu_core_register_types(void)
> > > > -{
> > > > - int i;
> > > > -
> > > > - type_register_static(&spapr_cpu_core_type_info);
> > > > -
> > > > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(spapr_core_models); i++) {
> > > > - TypeInfo type_info = {
> > > > - .parent = TYPE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE,
> > > > - .instance_size = sizeof(sPAPRCPUCore),
> > > > - .class_init = spapr_cpu_core_class_init,
> > > > - .class_data = (void *) spapr_core_models[i],
> > > > - };
> > > > -
> > > > - type_info.name = g_strdup_printf("%s-" TYPE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE,
> > > > - spapr_core_models[i]);
> > > > - type_register(&type_info);
> > > > - g_free((void *)type_info.name);
> > > > +#define DEFINE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE_TYPE(cpu_model) \
> > > > + { \
> > > > + .parent = TYPE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE, \587
> > > > + .class_data = (void *) cpu_model, \
> > > > + .class_init = spapr_cpu_core_class_init, \
> > > > + .name = SPAPR_CPU_CORE_TYPE_NAME(cpu_model), \
> > > > }
> > > > -}
> > > >
> > > > -type_init(spapr_cpu_core_register_types)
> > > > +static const TypeInfo spapr_cpu_core_type_infos[] = {
> > > > + {
> > > > + .name = TYPE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE,
> > > > + .parent = TYPE_CPU_CORE,
> > > > + .abstract = true,
> > > > + .instance_size = sizeof(sPAPRCPUCore),
> > > > + .class_size = sizeof(sPAPRCPUCoreClass),
> > > > + },
> > > > + DEFINE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE_TYPE("970_v2.2"),
> > > > + DEFINE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE_TYPE("970mp_v1.0"),
> > > > + DEFINE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE_TYPE("970mp_v1.1"),
> > > > + DEFINE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE_TYPE("power5+_v2.1"),
> > > > + DEFINE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE_TYPE("power7_v2.3"),
> > > > + DEFINE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE_TYPE("power7+_v2.1"),
> > > > + DEFINE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE_TYPE("power8_v2.0"),
> > > > + DEFINE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE_TYPE("power8e_v2.1"),
> > > > + DEFINE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE_TYPE("power8nvl_v1.0"),
> > > > + DEFINE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE_TYPE("power9_v1.0"),
> > > > + DEFINE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE_TYPE("power9_v2.0"),
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +DEFINE_TYPES(spapr_cpu_core_type_infos)
> > >
> > >
> >
>
- [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 10/24] ppc: 40p/prep: replace cpu_model with cpu_type, (continued)
- [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 10/24] ppc: 40p/prep: replace cpu_model with cpu_type, Igor Mammedov, 2017/10/09
- [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 11/24] ppc: spapr: replace ppc_cpu_parse_features() with cpu_parse_cpu_model(), Igor Mammedov, 2017/10/09
- [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 09/24] ppc: virtex-ml507: replace cpu_model with cpu_type, Igor Mammedov, 2017/10/09
- [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 12/24] ppc: move '-cpu foo, compat=xxx' parsing into ppc_cpu_parse_featurestr(), Igor Mammedov, 2017/10/09
- [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 13/24] ppc: spapr: define core types statically, Igor Mammedov, 2017/10/09
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 13/24] ppc: spapr: define core types statically, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2017/10/11
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 15/24] ppc: spapr: register 'host' core type along with the rest of core types, Igor Mammedov, 2017/10/09
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 14/24] ppc: spapr: use cpu type name directly, Igor Mammedov, 2017/10/09
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 16/24] ppc: spapr: use cpu model names as tcg defaults instead of aliases, Igor Mammedov, 2017/10/09
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 17/24] ppc: move ppc_cpu_lookup_alias() before its first user, Igor Mammedov, 2017/10/09