[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Boot flakiness with QEMU 3.1.0 and Clang built kernels
From: |
Nathan Chancellor |
Subject: |
Re: Boot flakiness with QEMU 3.1.0 and Clang built kernels |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Apr 2020 16:35:51 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) |
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 11:57:23PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Nicholas Piggin's on April 11, 2020 7:32 pm:
> > Nathan Chancellor's on April 11, 2020 10:53 am:
> >> The tt.config values are needed to reproduce but I did not verify that
> >> ONLY tt.config was needed. Other than that, no, we are just building
> >> either pseries_defconfig or powernv_defconfig with those configs and
> >> letting it boot up with a simple initramfs, which prints the version
> >> string then shuts the machine down.
> >>
> >> Let me know if you need any more information, cheers!
> >
> > Okay I can reproduce it. Sometimes it eventually recovers after a long
> > pause, and some keyboard input often helps it along. So that seems like
> > it might be a lost interrupt.
> >
> > POWER8 vs POWER9 might just be a timing thing if P9 is still hanging
> > sometimes. I wasn't able to reproduce it with defconfig+tt.config, I
> > needed your other config with various other debug options.
> >
> > Thanks for the very good report. I'll let you know what I find.
>
> It looks like a qemu bug. Booting with '-d int' shows the decrementer
> simply stops firing at the point of the hang, even though MSR[EE]=1 and
> the DEC register is wrapping. Linux appears to be doing the right thing
> as far as I can tell (not losing interrupts).
>
> This qemu patch fixes the boot hang for me. I don't know that qemu
> really has the right idea of "context synchronizing" as defined in the
> powerpc architecture -- mtmsrd L=1 is not context synchronizing but that
> does not mean it can avoid looking at exceptions until the next such
> event. It looks like the decrementer exception goes high but the
> execution of mtmsrd L=1 is ignoring it.
>
> Prior to the Linux patch 3282a3da25b you bisected to, interrupt replay
> code would return with an 'rfi' instruction as part of interrupt return,
> which probably helped to get things moving along a bit. However it would
> not be foolproof, and Cedric did say he encountered some mysterious
> lockups under load with qemu powernv before that patch was merged, so
> maybe it's the same issue?
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
> The patch is a bit of a hack, but if you can run it and verify it fixes
> your boot hang would be good.
Yes, with this patch applied on top of 5.0.0-rc2 and using the
pseries-3.1 and powernv8 machines, I do not see any hangs with a clang
built kernel at b032227c62939b5481bcd45442b36dfa263f4a7c across 100
boots.
If you happen to send it upstream:
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <address@hidden>
Thanks for looking into it!
> ---
>
> diff --git a/target/ppc/translate.c b/target/ppc/translate.c
> index b207fb5386..1d997f5c32 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/translate.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/translate.c
> @@ -4364,12 +4364,21 @@ static void gen_mtmsrd(DisasContext *ctx)
> if (ctx->opcode & 0x00010000) {
> /* Special form that does not need any synchronisation */
> TCGv t0 = tcg_temp_new();
> + TCGv t1 = tcg_temp_new();
> tcg_gen_andi_tl(t0, cpu_gpr[rS(ctx->opcode)],
> (1 << MSR_RI) | (1 << MSR_EE));
> - tcg_gen_andi_tl(cpu_msr, cpu_msr,
> + tcg_gen_andi_tl(t1, cpu_msr,
> ~(target_ulong)((1 << MSR_RI) | (1 << MSR_EE)));
> - tcg_gen_or_tl(cpu_msr, cpu_msr, t0);
> + tcg_gen_or_tl(t1, t1, t0);
> +
> + gen_update_nip(ctx, ctx->base.pc_next);
> + gen_helper_store_msr(cpu_env, t1);
> tcg_temp_free(t0);
> + tcg_temp_free(t1);
> + /* Must stop the translation as machine state (may have) changed */
> + /* Note that mtmsr is not always defined as context-synchronizing */
> + gen_stop_exception(ctx);
> +
> } else {
> /*
> * XXX: we need to update nip before the store if we enter
Cheers,
Nathan