qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] target/riscv: Quiet Coverity complains about vamo*


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] target/riscv: Quiet Coverity complains about vamo*
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:30:35 +0100

On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 16:19, Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 6:38 AM LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com> wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>

Interestingly Coverity's latest scan has decided all these
issues are 'fixed', even without the assert. I guess that the
online version of Coverity has had an improvement to its
checking and so is now able to figure out that it's not going
to overrun the array? Still I think the assert is worth having.

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]