qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: riscv: deprecate riscv,isa


From: Conor Dooley
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: riscv: deprecate riscv,isa
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 22:23:50 +0100

Rob,
Before I press on with more versions...

On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 08:30:28PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 01:15:37PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 03:12:12PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 10:42:34PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 02:30:53PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Why not just have something like
> > > > > 
> > > > > mycpu {
> > > > >       ...
> > > > >       riscv,isa {
> > > > >               i;
> > > > >               m;
> > > > >               a;
> > > > >               zicsr;
> > > > >               ...
> > 
> > I prefer property names be globally unique. The tools are geared towards 
> > that too. That's largely a symptom of having 0 type information in the 
> > DT.
> > 
> > For example if you had an extension called 'reg', it would be a problem.
> 
> Per the current ISA rules, that'd not be valid. But then again, I do
> have trust issues & it's not like "reg" is the only property name in DT
> land.

...you say "prefer" here. Is that a NAK, or a "you keep the pieces"?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]