qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] RISC-V: Modularize common match conditions for trigge


From: Alistair Francis
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] RISC-V: Modularize common match conditions for trigger
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:44:56 +1000

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 11:16 AM Alvin Che-Chia Chang(張哲嘉)
<alvinga@andestech.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alistair,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 8:25 AM
> > To: Alvin Che-Chia Chang(張哲嘉) <alvinga@andestech.com>
> > Cc: qemu-riscv@nongnu.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org;
> > alistair.francis@wdc.com; bin.meng@windriver.com; liwei1518@gmail.com;
> > dbarboza@ventanamicro.com; zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] RISC-V: Modularize common match conditions for
> > trigger
> >
> > [EXTERNAL MAIL 外部信件]
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:22 PM Alvin Chang via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > According to RISC-V Debug specification, the enabled privilege levels
> > > of
> >
> > Can you specify what version of the debug spec?
>
> In general, this series does not add any new functionalities.
> The original implementation has duplicated code in type 2/3/6 triggers.
> I just eliminated those code and modularized them to be 
> trigger_common_match().
> Besides, we may want to check other conditions in the future, so this 
> function can be used for those purposes.

Ah, you are right. I just skimmed the message

>
> When I track the commit history, it seems the code is submitted in the 
> following commits two years ago:
> https://github.com/qemu/qemu/commit/95799e36c15a9ab602a388491c40f6860f6ae8bf
> https://github.com/qemu/qemu/commit/b5f6379d134bd201d52380c73ff73565e6a4321e
> https://github.com/qemu/qemu/commit/c32461d8eeb17490b1b1e969e2ce8f1ecd83bfbb
> https://github.com/qemu/qemu/commit/c472c142a7552f5b0e40378d5643a2810ef1b111
>
> Since they mentioned the "type 6" trigger and "Sdtrig" extension, I assume 
> current implementation is based on Debug Spec version 1.0
> There is no type 6 trigger and Sdtrig extension in Debug Spec version 0.13

Yeah, we are a weird mix-match of the two unfortunately. Which is why
I wanted to be explicit about which debug spec version you are
targeting.

>
> Sincerely,
> Alvin Chang
>
> >
> > Ideally if you can link directly to the PDF that would be very useful.
> > There are multiple versions so it's hard to keep track of.
> >
> > Alistair
> >
> > > the trigger is common match conditions for all the types of the trigger.
> > > This series modularize the code for checking the privilege levels of
> > > type 2/3/6 triggers by implementing functions trigger_common_match()
> > > and trigger_priv_match().
> > >
> > > Additional match conditions, such as CSR tcontrol and textra, can be
> > > further implemented into trigger_common_match() in the future.
> > >
> > > Changes from v1:
> > > - Fix typo
> > > - Add commit description for changing behavior of looping the triggers
> > >   when we check type 2 triggers.
> > >
> > > Alvin Chang (4):
> > >   target/riscv: Add functions for common matching conditions of trigger
> > >   target/riscv: Apply modularized matching conditions for breakpoint
> > >   target/riscv: Apply modularized matching conditions for watchpoint
> > >   target/riscv: Apply modularized matching conditions for icount
> > > trigger
> > >
> > >  target/riscv/debug.c | 124
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > >  1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >
> > >
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
>
> This e-mail (and its attachments) may contain confidential and legally 
> privileged information or information protected from disclosure. If you are 
> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
> copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein is strictly 
> prohibited. In this case, please immediately notify the sender by return 
> e-mail, delete the message (and any accompanying documents) and destroy all 
> printed hard copies. Thank you for your cooperation.
>
> Copyright ANDES TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION - All Rights Reserved.

I'm not sure what you want me to do here

Alistair



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]