[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/2] target/riscv: Fix the hpmevent mask
From: |
Alistair Francis |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 1/2] target/riscv: Fix the hpmevent mask |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:47:31 +1000 |
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 10:51 AM Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> wrote:
>
> As per the latest privilege specification v1.13[1], the sscofpmf
> only reserves first 8 bits of hpmeventX. Update the corresponding
> masks accordingly.
>
> [1]https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/issues/1578
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> ---
> target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> index f97c48a3943f..b48c0af9d48e 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,10 @@
> (((uint64_t)(val) * ((mask) & ~((mask) << 1))) & \
> (uint64_t)(mask)))
>
> +#ifndef GENMASK_ULL
> +#define GENMASK_ULL(h, l) (((~0ULL) >> (63 - (h) + (l))) << (l))
> +#endif
We should use the existing MAKE_64BIT_MASK() and avoid adding new mask macros
Alistair
> +
> /* Extension context status mask */
> #define EXT_STATUS_MASK 0x3ULL
>
> @@ -933,9 +937,8 @@ typedef enum RISCVException {
> MHPMEVENTH_BIT_VSINH | \
> MHPMEVENTH_BIT_VUINH)
>
> -#define MHPMEVENT_SSCOF_MASK _ULL(0xFFFF000000000000)
> -#define MHPMEVENT_IDX_MASK 0xFFFFF
> -#define MHPMEVENT_SSCOF_RESVD 16
> +#define MHPMEVENT_SSCOF_MASK GENMASK_ULL(63, 56)
> +#define MHPMEVENT_IDX_MASK (~MHPMEVENT_SSCOF_MASK)
>
> /* RISC-V-specific interrupt pending bits. */
> #define CPU_INTERRUPT_RNMI CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_EXT_0
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>