qemu-rust
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC PATCH 01/11] rust: qemu_api: do not disable lints outside bindg


From: Junjie Mao
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/11] rust: qemu_api: do not disable lints outside bindgen-generated code
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:46:24 +0800
User-agent: mu4e 1.6.10; emacs 27.1

Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:

> On 11/12/24 11:10, Junjie Mao wrote:
>> diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
>> index 1239f5c48c..8cea09ffe1 100644
>> --- a/meson.build
>> +++ b/meson.build
>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ project('qemu', ['c'], meson_version: '>=1.5.0',
>>           version: files('VERSION'))
>>   meson.add_devenv({ 'MESON_BUILD_ROOT' : meson.project_build_root() })
>> +meson.add_devenv({ 'CARGO_TARGET_DIR' : meson.project_build_root() / 
>> 'cargo' })
>
> I think I'd rather avoid using CARGO_TARGET_DIR, in case someone forgets 
> he/she
> is in the devenv.
>

I should have dropped this line earlier. It was from my first attempt
where I wanted to put the generated bindings directly to cargo OUT_DIR
(so that file copy can be avoided). That didn't work because OUT_DIR
contains hashes that are hard to predict.

>>   add_test_setup('quick', exclude_suites: ['slow', 'thorough'], is_default: 
>> true)
>>   add_test_setup('slow', exclude_suites: ['thorough'], env: 
>> ['G_TEST_SLOW=1', 'SPEED=slow'])
>> @@ -4083,7 +4084,7 @@ if have_rust
>>     bindings_rs = rust.bindgen(
>>       input: 'rust/wrapper.h',
>>       dependencies: common_ss.all_dependencies(),
>> -    output: 'bindings.rs.inc',
>> +    output: 'bindings.inc.rs',
>
> Needs a comment, but I guess it's okay.
>
>> -    println!("cargo:rustc-env=BINDINGS_RS_INC={}", file);
>> +    let out_dir = env::var("OUT_DIR").unwrap();
>> +    let dest_path = format!("{}/bindings.inc.rs", out_dir);
>> +    copy(&file, Path::new(&dest_path))?;
>
> A symbolic link seems to work too.  Thanks for the tip!

Linux-based hosts should be fine. Should we test if symlinks also work
on W32/W64 systems?

>
> Paolo

--
Best Regards
Junjie Mao



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]