Re: [qemu-s390x] [Process] QEMU submaintainers and pull requests

[Peter Maydell]

On 16 February 2018 at 11:18, Cornelia Huck <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for 2.13 (or whatever it will be called), I'd like to switch to a
> submaintainer model for s390x, where maintainers for a certain s390x
> area (including myself) send me pull requests that I integrate into
> s390-next resp. s390-fixes, for which I send a pull request to merge
> into master.
>
> The problem here is that I don't want these sub pull requests to be
> picked up by Peter's scripts, generating confusion. So far, my ideas
> have been:
>
> - Post s390 pull requests only to address@hidden This sucks, as
>   it makes part of the process intransparent to any QEMU developer not
>   subscribed to that mailing list.
> - Put a certain marker into the subject, like "PULL *s390x*" or so. I'm
>   not sure how robust that is.
> - Ditch the pull request idea, keep applying patches. This is not quite
>   as bad as it sounds, as I have the infrastructure to apply patches
>   anyway, but it hides the real workflow (and simply pulling is likely
>   less work for me in the long run.)

The block folks are already doing this, so we should just
formalize what they're doing at the moment I guess. From my point
of view as long as there's something I can easily filter
in/out in the email body or subject so I don't get confused
(and which doesn't require me to update my filters every time
a new subsystem switches to using submaintainer pulls!)
I don't mind about the rest of it. Maybe a subject line with
'PULL SUBSYSTEM s390x' (ditto block, etc etc) ?

thanks
-- PMM