qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 1/7] s390x/tod: factor out TOD into separate


From: Cornelia Huck
Subject: Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 1/7] s390x/tod: factor out TOD into separate device
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 13:10:18 +0200

On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 12:49:23 +0200
David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 04.06.2018 14:14, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 14:00:43 +0200
> > David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
> >   
> >> On 04.06.2018 13:38, Cornelia Huck wrote:  
> >>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 13:37:02 +0200
> >>> David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>>     
> >>>> Let's treat this like a separate device. TCG will have to store the
> >>>> actual state/time later on.
> >>>>
> >>>> Include cpu-qom.h in kvm_s390x.h (due to S390CPU) to compile tod-kvm.c.  
> >>>>   
> >>>
> >>> Can't you include it in tod-kvm.c instead? Why was it not needed before?  
> >>>   
> >>
> >> Guess I can, kvm_s390x.h looks to me like the right place, as S390CPU is
> >> used in there.
> >>
> >> All other users include "cpu.h" already, so it isn't needed.  
> > 
> > Hm, and for kvm_s390_irq, this file is using a forward declaration,
> > which would likely be more awkward for this structure.  
> 
> I remember that we wanted to use cpu-qom.h for this typedef fun, that's
> why I decided to do it this way.
> 
> > 
> > Header dependencies are always fun :)
> >   
> 
> So what do you suggest? Thanks!
> 

Let's go with cpu-qom.h for this, then.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]