qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 4/5] s390x/vfio: ap: Intercepting AP Queue In


From: Cornelia Huck
Subject: Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 4/5] s390x/vfio: ap: Intercepting AP Queue Interrupt Control
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 13:40:53 +0100

On Fri,  2 Nov 2018 11:30:20 +0100
Pierre Morel <address@hidden> wrote:

> From: Pierre Morel <address@hidden>

Meta: you may want to rewrite your authorship to the shorter address.

> 
> We intercept the PQAP(AQIC) instruction.
> 
> Until we implement AQIC we return a PGM_OPERATION.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/vfio/ap.c                 | 10 ++++++++++
>  include/hw/s390x/ap-device.h |  9 +++++++++
>  target/s390x/kvm.c           | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/ap.c b/hw/vfio/ap.c
> index 3962bb74e5..d8d9cadc46 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/ap.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/ap.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,16 @@ typedef struct VFIOAPDevice {
>  #define VFIO_AP_DEVICE(obj) \
>          OBJECT_CHECK(VFIOAPDevice, (obj), VFIO_AP_DEVICE_TYPE)
>  
> +/*
> + * ap_pqap
> + * @env: environment pointing to registers
> + * return value: Code Condition
> + */
> +int ap_pqap(CPUS390XState *env)
> +{
> +    return -PGM_OPERATION;
> +}

I'm not sure whether it makes sense to add such a skeleton handler
here; perhaps we should merge with the next patch that actually does
something for AQCI?

> +
>  static void vfio_ap_compute_needs_reset(VFIODevice *vdev)
>  {
>      vdev->needs_reset = false;
> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/ap-device.h b/include/hw/s390x/ap-device.h
> index 765e9082a3..a83ea096c7 100644
> --- a/include/hw/s390x/ap-device.h
> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/ap-device.h
> @@ -19,4 +19,13 @@ typedef struct APDevice {
>  #define AP_DEVICE(obj) \
>      OBJECT_CHECK(APDevice, (obj), AP_DEVICE_TYPE)
>  
> +#define AP_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(obj) \
> +    OBJECT_GET_CLASS(APDeviceClass, (obj), AP_DEVICE_TYPE)
> +
> +#define AP_DEVICE_CLASS(klass) \
> +    OBJECT_CLASS_CHECK(APDeviceClass, (klass), AP_DEVICE_TYPE)

Looks like an unrelated change -- does that maybe belong into the next
patch?

> +
> +#include "cpu.h"
> +int ap_pqap(CPUS390XState *env);
> +
>  #endif /* HW_S390X_AP_DEVICE_H */

The wiring up looks reasonable.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]