[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] target/s390x: Fix LGPL version in the file head
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] target/s390x: Fix LGPL version in the file header comments |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:51:56 +0100 |
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:37:47 +0100
Thomas Huth <address@hidden> wrote:
> It's either "GNU *Library* General Public License version 2" or
> "GNU Lesser General Public License version *2.1*", but there was
> no "version 2.0" of the "Lesser" license. So assume that version
> 2.1 is meant here.
I think we can assume that.
Given that there have been several of these cases (and that there's a
lot of boilerplate in general): Should we adopt SPDX license
identifiers for QEMU, as the Linux kernel did? They also discovered and
fixed some problems/oddities while at it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
> ---
> target/s390x/cc_helper.c | 2 +-
> target/s390x/excp_helper.c | 2 +-
> target/s390x/fpu_helper.c | 2 +-
> target/s390x/gdbstub.c | 2 +-
> target/s390x/helper.c | 2 +-
> target/s390x/int_helper.c | 2 +-
> target/s390x/mem_helper.c | 2 +-
> target/s390x/misc_helper.c | 2 +-
> target/s390x/translate.c | 2 +-
> 9 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Is this going through the trivial tree? If so,
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <address@hidden>
I can also take this through the s390x tree.