[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] s390x: Fix the confusing contributions-after-20
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] s390x: Fix the confusing contributions-after-2012 license statements |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:43:29 +0100 |
On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 13:41:33 +0100
Thomas Huth <address@hidden> wrote:
> The license information in these files is rather confusing. The text
> declares LGPL first, but then says that contributions after 2012 are
> licensed under the GPL instead. How should the average user who just
> downloaded the release tarball know which part is now GPL and which
> is LGPL?
>
> Looking at the text of the LGPL (see COPYING.LIB in the top directory),
> the license clearly states how this should be done instead:
>
> "3. You may opt to apply the terms of the ordinary GNU General Public
> License instead of this License to a given copy of the Library. To do
> this, you must alter all the notices that refer to this License, so
> that they refer to the ordinary GNU General Public License, version 2,
> instead of to this License."
>
> Thus let's clean up the confusing statements and use the proper GPL
> text only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
> ---
> linux-user/s390x/target_cpu.h | 19 ++++++++-----------
> target/s390x/cpu.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
> target/s390x/cpu.h | 19 ++++++++-----------
> target/s390x/kvm.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
> 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
Thanks, applied.
- Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] s390x: Fix the confusing contributions-after-2012 license statements, (continued)
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] s390x: Fix the confusing contributions-after-2012 license statements, Christian Borntraeger, 2019/02/06
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH] s390x: Fix the confusing contributions-after-2012 license statements,
Cornelia Huck <=