qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v3 09/16] s390-bios: ptr2u32 and u32toptr


From: Jason J. Herne
Subject: Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v3 09/16] s390-bios: ptr2u32 and u32toptr
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 09:11:53 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1

On 3/5/19 2:22 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 01/03/2019 19.59, Jason J. Herne wrote:
Introduce inline functions to convert between pointers and unsigned 32-bit
ints. These are used to hide the ugliness required to  avoid compiler
warnings.

Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne <address@hidden>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <address@hidden>
---
  pc-bios/s390-ccw/helper.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 pc-bios/s390-ccw/helper.h

diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/helper.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/helper.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b8bc61b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/helper.h
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+#ifndef S390_CCW_HELPER_H
+#define S390_CCW_HELPER_H
+
+/* Avoids compiler warnings when casting a pointer to a u32 */
+static inline uint32_t ptr2u32(void *ptr)
+{

Would it make sense to add an IPL_assert(ptr <= 0xffffffff) here?


I'm not sure... I remember something about the bios always having to be below the 2^32 memory line. But I suppose it doesn't hurt to add the assert anyway. Then, someday, if my assumption proves not to be true or someone changes that assumption we are still covered.

--
-- Jason J. Herne (address@hidden)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]