[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 29/29] tests/tcg: target/s390x:
From: |
Alex Bennée |
Subject: |
Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 29/29] tests/tcg: target/s390x: Test MVO |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:47:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.3.4; emacs 27.0.50 |
David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> writes:
> Let's add the simple test based on the example from the PoP.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
> ---
> tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target | 1 +
> tests/tcg/s390x/mvo.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tests/tcg/s390x/mvo.c
>
> diff --git a/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target b/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target
> index 151dc075aa..6a3bfa8b29 100644
> --- a/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target
> +++ b/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target
> @@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ TESTS+=ipm
> TESTS+=exrl-trt
> TESTS+=exrl-trtr
> TESTS+=pack
> +TESTS+=mvo
> diff --git a/tests/tcg/s390x/mvo.c b/tests/tcg/s390x/mvo.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..5546fe2a97
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/tcg/s390x/mvo.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +
> +int main(void)
> +{
> + uint8_t dest[6] = {0xff, 0x77, 0x88, 0x99, 0x0c, 0xff};
> + uint8_t src[5] = {0xee, 0x12, 0x34, 0x56, 0xee};
> + uint8_t expected[6] = {0xff, 0x01, 0x23, 0x45, 0x6c, 0xff};
> + int i;
> +
> + asm volatile (
> + " mvo 0(4,%[dest]),0(3,%[src])\n"
> + :
> + : [dest] "d" (dest + 1),
> + [src] "d" (src + 1)
> + : "memory");
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(expected); i++) {
> + if (dest[i] != expected[i]) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "bad data\n");
> + return 1;
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
but...
can this test be expanded to check the page cross cases that caused you
so much trouble to track down?
--
Alex Bennée
- [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v3 21/29] s390x/tcg: OC: Fault-safe handling, (continued)
- [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v3 21/29] s390x/tcg: OC: Fault-safe handling, David Hildenbrand, 2019/09/16
- [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v3 22/29] s390x/tcg: XC: Fault-safe handling, David Hildenbrand, 2019/09/16
- [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v3 23/29] s390x/tcg: NC: Fault-safe handling, David Hildenbrand, 2019/09/16
- [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v3 24/29] s390x/tcg: MVCIN: Fault-safe handling, David Hildenbrand, 2019/09/16
- [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v3 25/29] s390x/tcg: MVN: Fault-safe handling, David Hildenbrand, 2019/09/16
- [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v3 26/29] s390x/tcg: MVZ: Fault-safe handling, David Hildenbrand, 2019/09/16
- [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v3 27/29] s390x/tcg: MVST: Fault-safe handling, David Hildenbrand, 2019/09/16
- [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v3 28/29] s390x/tcg: MVO: Fault-safe handling, David Hildenbrand, 2019/09/16
- [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v3 29/29] tests/tcg: target/s390x: Test MVO, David Hildenbrand, 2019/09/16
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v3 00/29] s390x/tcg: mem_helper: Fault-safe handling, David Hildenbrand, 2019/09/18