[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH 10/17] s390x/css: Pass local error object pointe
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH 10/17] s390x/css: Pass local error object pointer to error_append_hint() |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Sep 2019 10:50:08 +0200 |
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 12:46:42 -0500
Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 9/18/19 5:26 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 18:36:20 +0200
> > Greg Kurz <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:24:12 +0200
> >> Cornelia Huck <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:21:34 +0200
> >>> Greg Kurz <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Ensure that hints are added even if errp is &error_fatal or &error_abort.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> hw/s390x/s390-ccw.c | 6 ++++--
> >>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <address@hidden>
> >>>
> >>> Can also take this via the s390 tree, let me know what would work best.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I guess it would be easier to merge if each individual patch goes
> >> through the corresponding sub-maintainer tree. But Eric mentioned
> >> in another mail that the whole whole series could maybe go through
> >> Markus' error tree... so, I don't know which is best. :)
> >
> > Ok, it's probably best to take this through the s390 tree, as I plan to
> > send a pull request tomorrow :)
>
> If we go with Vladimir's idea of auto-propagation, this change just gets
> rewritten again as part of our simplifications to drop all use of
> 'local_err' in favor of instead using the macro that makes errp always
> safe to use locally.
>
Fair enough. That auto-propagation approach really looks nice, so I'll
go ahead and unqueue this patch again.