[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH] s390x/flic: adapter routes handling if !kernel_irqchip
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
[PATCH] s390x/flic: adapter routes handling if !kernel_irqchip |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jan 2020 13:37:03 +0100 |
If the kernel irqchip has been disabled, we don't want the
{add,release}_adapter_routes routines to call any kvm_irqchip_*
interfaces, as they may rely on an irqchip actually having been
created. Just take a quick exit in that case instead.
Fixes: d426d9fba8ea ("s390x/virtio-ccw: wire up irq routing and irqfds")
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <address@hidden>
---
Without this patch, QEMU with kernel_irqchip=off will crash in
kvm_irqchip_release_virq(), so alternatively, we could add a check
there. kvm_irqchip_add_adapter_route() is actually fine.
---
hw/intc/s390_flic_kvm.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/intc/s390_flic_kvm.c b/hw/intc/s390_flic_kvm.c
index dddd33ea61c8..44b7960ebcc8 100644
--- a/hw/intc/s390_flic_kvm.c
+++ b/hw/intc/s390_flic_kvm.c
@@ -331,6 +331,10 @@ static int kvm_s390_add_adapter_routes(S390FLICState *fs,
int ret, i;
uint64_t ind_offset = routes->adapter.ind_offset;
+ if (!kvm_gsi_routing_enabled()) {
+ return -ENOSYS;
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < routes->num_routes; i++) {
ret = kvm_irqchip_add_adapter_route(kvm_state, &routes->adapter);
if (ret < 0) {
@@ -358,6 +362,10 @@ static void kvm_s390_release_adapter_routes(S390FLICState
*fs,
{
int i;
+ if (!kvm_gsi_routing_enabled()) {
+ return;
+ }
+
for (i = 0; i < routes->num_routes; i++) {
if (routes->gsi[i] >= 0) {
kvm_irqchip_release_virq(kvm_state, routes->gsi[i]);
--
2.21.1
- [PATCH] s390x/flic: adapter routes handling if !kernel_irqchip,
Cornelia Huck <=