[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Cleanups around the 'current_machine' global variab
|
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Cleanups around the 'current_machine' global variable |
|
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:44:01 +0100 |
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:27:09 +0100
Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 21/01/20 12:03, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > v1 was "Replace current_machine by qdev_get_machine()":
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg669611.html
> >
> > But Markus objected, see:
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg670122.html
> > and older discussion:
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg611338.html
> >
> > This series salvage patches from v1, and add other trivial cleanups.
> >
> > Can the ARM/PPC/S390 patches could go via their own tree, and the
> > rest via Paolo's 'misc' tree?
>
> I think they're trivial enough so (with the exception of patch 7) I have
> queued them.
I had already queued the s390 patch; let's just see who gets their pull
req out first, I can also unqueue it again.
- [PATCH v2 08/10] accel: Introduce the current_accel() wrapper, (continued)
- [PATCH v2 08/10] accel: Introduce the current_accel() wrapper, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/01/21
- [PATCH v2 09/10] accel: Replace current_machine->accelerator by current_accel() wrapper, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/01/21
- [PATCH v2 10/10] accel/tcg: Sanitize include path, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/01/21
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Cleanups around the 'current_machine' global variable, Markus Armbruster, 2020/01/21
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Cleanups around the 'current_machine' global variable, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/01/21
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Cleanups around the 'current_machine' global variable,
Cornelia Huck <=