Re: [PATCH 00/22] linux-user: generate syscall_nr.sh

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

On 2/17/20 11:35 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> This series copies the files syscall.tbl from linux v5.5 and generates
> the file syscall_nr.h from them.
[...]
> Laurent Vivier (22):
>    linux-user: introduce parameters to generate syscall_nr.h
>    linux-user,alpha: add syscall table generation support
>    linux-user,hppa: add syscall table generation support
>    linux-user,m68k: add syscall table generation support
>    linux-user,xtensa: add syscall table generation support
>    linux-user,sh4: add syscall table generation support
>    linux-user,microblaze: add syscall table generation support
>    linux-user,arm: add syscall table generation support
>    linux-user,ppc: split syscall_nr.h
>    linux-user,ppc: add syscall table generation support
>    linux-user,s390x: remove syscall definitions for !TARGET_S390X
>    linux-user,s390x: add syscall table generation support
>    linux-user,sparc,sparc64: add syscall table generation support
>    linux-user,i386: add syscall table generation support
>    linux-user,x86_64: add syscall table generation support
>    linux-user,mips: add syscall table generation support
>    linux-user,mips64: split syscall_nr.h
>    linux-user,mips64: add syscall table generation support
>    linux-user,scripts: add a script to update syscall.tbl
>    linux-user: update syscall.tbl from linux 0bf999f9c5e7
>    linux-user,mips: move content of mips_syscall_args
>    linux-user,mips: update syscall-args-o32.c.inc

I suppose the patch subject was generated and you meant to use 
"linux-user/" instead of "linux-user,". Is that right?