[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v9 12/15] s390x: protvirt: Move IO control structures over SI
From: |
David Hildenbrand |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v9 12/15] s390x: protvirt: Move IO control structures over SIDA |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:10:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 |
On 11.03.20 14:21, Janosch Frank wrote:
> For protected guests, we need to put the IO emulation results into the
> SIDA, so SIE will write them into the guest at the next entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <address@hidden>
> ---
> target/s390x/ioinst.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/s390x/ioinst.c b/target/s390x/ioinst.c
> index 481d789de9e09a04..61095bdc9ffef436 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/ioinst.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/ioinst.c
> @@ -136,9 +136,13 @@ void ioinst_handle_msch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1,
> uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
> s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
> return;
> }
> - if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, ar, &schib, sizeof(schib))) {
> - s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
> - return;
> + if (s390_is_pv()) {
> + s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, addr, &schib, sizeof(schib));
> + } else {
} else if ( ) {?
> + if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, ar, &schib, sizeof(schib))) {
> + s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
> + return;
> + }
> }
> if (ioinst_disassemble_sch_ident(reg1, &m, &cssid, &ssid, &schid) ||
> !ioinst_schib_valid(&schib)) {
> @@ -193,9 +197,13 @@ void ioinst_handle_ssch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1,
> uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
> s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
> return;
> }
> - if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, ar, &orig_orb, sizeof(orb))) {
> - s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
> - return;
> + if (s390_is_pv()) {
> + s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, addr, &orig_orb, sizeof(orb));
> + } else {
dito
> + if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, ar, &orig_orb, sizeof(orb))) {
> + s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
> + return;
> + }
> }
[...]
>
> @@ -258,6 +271,9 @@ void ioinst_handle_stsch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1,
> uint32_t ipb,
> }
>
> if (ioinst_disassemble_sch_ident(reg1, &m, &cssid, &ssid, &schid)) {
> + if (s390_is_pv()) {
> + return;
> + }
I'd prefer a comment here, explaining what the UV checks and why we
don't have to do anything.
> /*
> * As operand exceptions have a lower priority than access
> exceptions,
> * we check whether the memory area is writeable (injecting the
> @@ -290,14 +306,19 @@ void ioinst_handle_stsch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1,
> uint32_t ipb,
> }
> }
> if (cc != 3) {
> - if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &schib,
> - sizeof(schib)) != 0) {
> - s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
> - return;
> + if (s390_is_pv()) {
> + s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, addr, &schib, sizeof(schib));
> + } else {
> + if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &schib,
> + sizeof(schib)) != 0) {
> + s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
> + return;
> + }
> }
> } else {
> /* Access exceptions have a higher priority than cc3 */
> - if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, addr, ar, sizeof(schib)) !=
> 0) {
> + if (!s390_is_pv() &&
> + s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, addr, ar, sizeof(schib)) !=
> 0) {
> s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
> return;
> }
> @@ -334,15 +355,20 @@ int ioinst_handle_tsch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1,
> uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
> }
> /* 0 - status pending, 1 - not status pending, 3 - not operational */
> if (cc != 3) {
> - if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &irb, irb_len) != 0) {
> - s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
> - return -EFAULT;
> + if (s390_is_pv()) {
> + s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, addr, &irb, irb_len);
> + } else {
> + if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &irb, irb_len) != 0) {
dito
> + s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> }
> css_do_tsch_update_subch(sch);
> } else {
> irb_len = sizeof(irb) - sizeof(irb.emw);
> /* Access exceptions have a higher priority than cc3 */
> - if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, addr, ar, irb_len) != 0) {
> + if (!s390_is_pv() &&
> + s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, addr, ar, irb_len) != 0) {
> s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
> return -EFAULT;
> }
> @@ -640,9 +666,13 @@ void ioinst_handle_chsc(S390CPU *cpu, uint32_t ipb,
> uintptr_t ra)
> * present CHSC sub-handlers ... if we ever need more, we should take
> * care of req->len here first.
> */
> - if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, reg, buf, sizeof(ChscReq))) {
> - s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
> - return;
> + if (s390_is_pv()) {
> + s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, addr, buf, sizeof(ChscReq));
> + } else {
dito.
> + if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, reg, buf, sizeof(ChscReq))) {
> + s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
> + return;
> + }
> }
LGTM
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
- Re: [PATCH v9 10/15] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDA, (continued)
- [PATCH v9 05/15] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/11
- [PATCH v9 03/15] s390x: protvirt: Add migration blocker, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/11
- [PATCH v9 12/15] s390x: protvirt: Move IO control structures over SIDA, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/11
- [PATCH v9 06/15] s390x: Add SIDA memory ops, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/11
- Re: [PATCH v9 00/15] s390x: Protected Virtualization support, no-reply, 2020/03/11
- Re: [PATCH v9 00/15] s390x: Protected Virtualization support, no-reply, 2020/03/11
- [PATCH v9] s390x: protvirt: Fence huge pages, Janosch Frank, 2020/03/12