qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v9 13/15] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly


From: Christian Borntraeger
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 13/15] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:51:12 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0

On 11.03.20 14:21, Janosch Frank wrote:
> For protected VMs status storing is not done by QEMU anymore.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>


> ---
>  target/s390x/helper.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/target/s390x/helper.c b/target/s390x/helper.c
> index ed726849114f2f35..5022df8812d406c9 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/helper.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/helper.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>  #include "qemu/timer.h"
>  #include "qemu/qemu-print.h"
>  #include "hw/s390x/ioinst.h"
> +#include "hw/s390x/pv.h"
>  #include "sysemu/hw_accel.h"
>  #include "sysemu/runstate.h"
>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> @@ -246,6 +247,11 @@ int s390_store_status(S390CPU *cpu, hwaddr addr, bool 
> store_arch)
>      hwaddr len = sizeof(*sa);
>      int i;
>  
> +    /* Storing will occur on next SIE entry for protected VMs */

Maybe ... next SIE entry of the sending CPU .... 
?

Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <address@hidden>


> +    if (s390_is_pv()) {
> +        return 0;
> +    }
> +
>      sa = cpu_physical_memory_map(addr, &len, true);
>      if (!sa) {
>          return -EFAULT;
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]