qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3] s390x: Add stsi 3.2.2 tests


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3] s390x: Add stsi 3.2.2 tests
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:38:01 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0

On 31.03.20 10:29, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 3/31/20 10:24 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 31.03.20 09:14, Janosch Frank wrote:
>>> Subcode 3.2.2 is handled by KVM/QEMU and should therefore be tested
>>> a bit more thorough.
>>>
>>> In this test we set a custom name and uuid through the QEMU command
>>> line. Both parameters will be passed to the guest on a stsi subcode
>>> 3.2.2 call and will then be checked.
>>>
>>> We also compare the configured cpu numbers against the smp reported
>>> numbers and if the reserved + configured add up to the total number
>>> reported.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> * Tabify on struct
>>> * Moved prefix_push up a bit
>>> * Replaced returns with goto out to pop prefix
>>>
>>> ---
>>>  s390x/stsi.c        | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  s390x/unittests.cfg |  1 +
>>>  2 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/s390x/stsi.c b/s390x/stsi.c
>>> index e9206bca137d2edb..17ad33eefb9c948a 100644
>>> --- a/s390x/stsi.c
>>> +++ b/s390x/stsi.c
>>> @@ -14,7 +14,28 @@
>>>  #include <asm/page.h>
>>>  #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
>>>  #include <asm/interrupt.h>
>>> +#include <smp.h>
>>>  
>>> +struct stsi_322 {
>>> +    uint8_t reserved[31];
>>> +    uint8_t count;
>>> +    struct {
>>> +   uint8_t reserved2[4];
>>> +   uint16_t total_cpus;
>>> +   uint16_t conf_cpus;
>>> +   uint16_t standby_cpus;
>>> +   uint16_t reserved_cpus;
>>> +   uint8_t name[8];
>>> +   uint32_t caf;
>>> +   uint8_t cpi[16];
>>> +   uint8_t reserved5[3];
>>> +   uint8_t ext_name_encoding;
>>> +   uint32_t reserved3;
>>> +   uint8_t uuid[16];
>>> +    } vm[8];
>>> +    uint8_t reserved4[1504];
>>> +    uint8_t ext_names[8][256];
>>
>> Sorry, still no proper use of tabs. (can fixup if you agree)
>>
> Sure, go ahead
> 
> 

Queued to

https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/kvm-unit-tests.git s390x-next

with the indentation fixed.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]