qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH 1/2] virtio-ccw: fix virtio_set_ind_atomic


From: Halil Pasic
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] virtio-ccw: fix virtio_set_ind_atomic
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 06:50:34 +0200

The atomic_cmpxchg() loop is broken because we occasionally end up with
old and _old having different values (a legit compiler can generate code
that accessed *ind_addr again to pick up a value for _old instead of
using the value of old that was already fetched according to the
rules of the abstract machine). This means the underlying CS instruction
may use a different old (_old) than the one we intended to use if
atomic_cmpxchg() performed the xchg part.

Let us use volatile to force the rules of the abstract machine for
accesses to *ind_addr. Let us also rewrite the loop so, we that the
new old is used to compute the new desired value if the xchg part
is not performed.

Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Andre Wild <Andre.Wild1@ibm.com>
Fixes: 7e7494627f ("s390x/virtio-ccw: Adapter interrupt support.")
---
 hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
index c1f4bb1d33..3c988a000b 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c
@@ -786,9 +786,10 @@ static inline VirtioCcwDevice 
*to_virtio_ccw_dev_fast(DeviceState *d)
 static uint8_t virtio_set_ind_atomic(SubchDev *sch, uint64_t ind_loc,
                                      uint8_t to_be_set)
 {
-    uint8_t ind_old, ind_new;
+    uint8_t expected, actual;
     hwaddr len = 1;
-    uint8_t *ind_addr;
+    /* avoid  multiple fetches */
+    uint8_t volatile *ind_addr;
 
     ind_addr = cpu_physical_memory_map(ind_loc, &len, true);
     if (!ind_addr) {
@@ -796,14 +797,15 @@ static uint8_t virtio_set_ind_atomic(SubchDev *sch, 
uint64_t ind_loc,
                      __func__, sch->cssid, sch->ssid, sch->schid);
         return -1;
     }
+    actual = *ind_addr;
     do {
-        ind_old = *ind_addr;
-        ind_new = ind_old | to_be_set;
-    } while (atomic_cmpxchg(ind_addr, ind_old, ind_new) != ind_old);
-    trace_virtio_ccw_set_ind(ind_loc, ind_old, ind_new);
-    cpu_physical_memory_unmap(ind_addr, len, 1, len);
+        expected = actual;
+        actual = atomic_cmpxchg(ind_addr, expected, expected | to_be_set);
+    } while (actual != expected);
+    trace_virtio_ccw_set_ind(ind_loc, actual, actual | to_be_set);
+    cpu_physical_memory_unmap((void *)ind_addr, len, 1, len);
 
-    return ind_old;
+    return actual;
 }
 
 static void virtio_ccw_notify(DeviceState *d, uint16_t vector)
-- 
2.17.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]