[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/2] two atomic_cmpxchg() related fixes
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/2] two atomic_cmpxchg() related fixes |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Jul 2020 14:01:06 +0200 |
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 06:50:33 +0200
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> The story short: compiler can generate code that does two
> distinct fetches of *ind_addr for old and _old. If that happens we can
> not figure out if we had the desired xchg or not.
>
> Halil Pasic (2):
> virtio-ccw: fix virtio_set_ind_atomic
> s390x/pci: fix set_ind_atomic
>
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> hw/s390x/virtio-ccw.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 7d3660e79830a069f1848bb4fa1cdf8f666424fb
Have we managed to reach any kind of agreement on this? (A v2?)
We can still get in fixes post-softfreeze, of course.
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] two atomic_cmpxchg() related fixes,
Cornelia Huck <=