[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318
From: |
Collin Walling |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318 |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:26:20 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 |
On 7/15/20 12:04 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:36:35 -0400
> Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Polite ping. Patches have been sitting on the list for a few weeks now,
>> and it doesn't look like any further changes are requested (hopefully I
>> didn't miss something).
>
> The only thing I had was (I think) the logging of the length you just
> replied to. We can still tweak things like that later, of course.
>
> As these patches depend on a headers sync, I could not yet queue them.
> I can keep a preliminary version on a branch. I assume that the header
> changes will go in during the next kernel merge window? (If I missed
> something, apologies for that.)
>
Gotcha. Thanks for the update :)
There was an email on the KVM list a couple of days that made one change
to the Linux header. Just changed the integer used for the DIAG cap,
which should be reflected in QEMU as well.
https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg220548.html
Should I respin this patch series to include the new ack's and account
for the header sync?
>>
>> Thanks for everyone's time and patience. Stay safe out there.
>>
>> - Collin
>>
>
>
--
Regards,
Collin
Stay safe and stay healthy