[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 9/9] target/s390x: Use start-powered-off CPUState prop
From: |
Thiago Jung Bauermann |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 9/9] target/s390x: Use start-powered-off CPUState property |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Jul 2020 21:51:29 -0300 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 |
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:50:16AM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>> Instead of setting CPUState::halted to 1 in s390_cpu_initfn(), use the
>> start-powered-off property which makes cpu_common_reset() initialize it to
>> 1 in common code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> target/s390x/cpu.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> NB: I was only able to test that this patch builds. I wasn't able to
>> run it.
>>
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.c b/target/s390x/cpu.c
>> index 08eb674d22..d3a14af1d9 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.c
>> @@ -291,7 +291,8 @@ static void s390_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
>> S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(obj);
>>
>> cpu_set_cpustate_pointers(cpu);
>> - cs->halted = 1;
>> + object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(cs), "start-powered-off", true,
>> + &error_abort);
>
> Is this really OK? s390 CPUs don't seem to set halted=1 on reset
> today.
Hm, good point. That is indeed a behavior change that this patch
introduces. I'll point it out in the description for v3, and if it's
wrong then this patch can simply be dropped.
--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center
- [RFC PATCH v2 7/9] sparc/sun4m: Don't set CPUState::halted in cpu_devinit(), (continued)