[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH] s390x/pci: vfio-pci breakage with disabled mem enforceme
From: |
Niklas Schnelle |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH] s390x/pci: vfio-pci breakage with disabled mem enforcement |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:46:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 |
On 7/23/20 5:13 PM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> I noticed that after kernel commit abafbc55 'vfio-pci: Invalidate mmaps
> and block MMIO access on disabled memory' vfio-pci via qemu on s390x
> fails spectacularly, with errors in qemu like:
>
> qemu-system-s390x: vfio_region_read(0001:00:00.0:region0+0x0, 4) failed:
> Input/output error
>
> From read to bar 0 originating out of
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c:zpci_read_bar().
>
> So, I'm trying to figure out how to get vfio-pci happy again on s390x. From
> a bit of tracing, we seem to be triggering the new trap in
> __vfio_pci_memory_enabled(). Sure enough, if I just force this function to
> return 'true' as a test case, things work again.
> The included patch attempts to enforce the setting, which restores everything
> to working order but also triggers vfio_bar_restore() in the process.... So
> this isn't the right answer, more of a proof-of-concept.
>
> @Alex: Any guidance on what needs to happen to make qemu-s390x happy with this
> recent kernel change?
>
> @Nilkas/@Pierre: I wonder if this might be related to host device is_virtfn?
> I note that my host device lspci output looks like:
>
> 0000:00:00.0 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies MT27710 Family
> [ConnectX-4 Lx Virtual Function]
>
> But the device is not marked as is_virtfn.. Otherwise, Alex's fix
> from htps://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/25/628 should cover the case.
With commit e5794cf1a270 ("s390/pci: create links between PFs and VFs") I
introduced
the is_physfn field to struct zpci_dev which gets set through the
CLP Query PCI Function. Also with that commit this being 0 will set
is_virtfn to 1.
Interestingly looking at s390-pci-inst.c in QEMU I'd think that
on QEMU this should already be 0 and thus is_virtfn should be set
with Linux >5.8-rc1 and the missing case is actually for passing through
a PF where it would wrongly be 0 too.
Note: If the Linux instance does not see the
parent PF however the only way I know to test if it is a VF from userspace
is checking if /sys/bus/pci/devices/<dev>/vfn is non-zero which is platform
specific and currently wrongly set 0 on QEMU for VFs.
If the PF is known the mentioned commit will also create the
/sys/bus/pci/devices/<dev>/physfn symlink as on other platforms.
> Matthew Rosato (1):
> s390x/pci: Enforce PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY for vfio-pci
>
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
- [RFC PATCH] s390x/pci: Enforce PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY for vfio-pci, (continued)
- [RFC PATCH] s390x/pci: Enforce PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY for vfio-pci, Matthew Rosato, 2020/07/23
- Re: [RFC PATCH] s390x/pci: vfio-pci breakage with disabled mem enforcement, Alex Williamson, 2020/07/23
- Re: [RFC PATCH] s390x/pci: vfio-pci breakage with disabled mem enforcement, Matthew Rosato, 2020/07/23
- Re: [RFC PATCH] s390x/pci: vfio-pci breakage with disabled mem enforcement, Pierre Morel, 2020/07/27
- Re: [RFC PATCH] s390x/pci: vfio-pci breakage with disabled mem enforcement, Matthew Rosato, 2020/07/27
- Re: [RFC PATCH] s390x/pci: vfio-pci breakage with disabled mem enforcement, Alex Williamson, 2020/07/27
- Re: [RFC PATCH] s390x/pci: vfio-pci breakage with disabled mem enforcement, Niklas Schnelle, 2020/07/28
- Re: [RFC PATCH] s390x/pci: vfio-pci breakage with disabled mem enforcement, Alex Williamson, 2020/07/28
- Re: [RFC PATCH] s390x/pci: vfio-pci breakage with disabled mem enforcement, Niklas Schnelle, 2020/07/28
- Re: [RFC PATCH] s390x/pci: vfio-pci breakage with disabled mem enforcement, Niklas Schnelle, 2020/07/28
Re: [RFC PATCH] s390x/pci: vfio-pci breakage with disabled mem enforcement,
Niklas Schnelle <=