qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 00/13] s390x/pci: s390-pci updates for kernel 5.10-rc1


From: Alex Williamson
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] s390x/pci: s390-pci updates for kernel 5.10-rc1
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:53:54 -0600

On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:41:24 +0100
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:19:47 +0100
> Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:34:28 -0400
> > Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > Combined set of patches that exploit vfio/s390-pci features available in
> > > kernel 5.10-rc1.  This patch set is a combination of 
> > > 
> > > [PATCH v4 0/5] s390x/pci: Accomodate vfio DMA limiting
> > > 
> > > and
> > > 
> > > [PATCH v3 00/10] Retrieve zPCI hardware information from VFIO
> > > 
> > > with duplicate patches removed and a single header sync.  All patches have
> > > prior maintainer reviews except for:
> > > 
> > > - Patch 1 (update-linux-headers change to add new file)     
> > 
> > That one has ;)
> >   
> > > - Patch 2 (header sync against 5.10-rc1)    
> > 
> > I'm still unsure about the rdma/(q)atomic stuff -- had we reached any
> > conclusion there?
> >   
> > > - Patch 13 - contains a functional (debug) change; I switched from using
> > >   DPRINTFs to using trace events per Connie's request.  
> 
> Looks good.
> 
> I think that should go through the vfio tree, in case there are
> collisions with the migration stuff?
> 
> (The s390x queue is currently empty.)

Patches appear to apply cleanly on top of the migration series, but I
can take it if preferred.  Thanks,

Alex




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]