qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3] target/s390x: Implement the MVPG condition-code-option bi


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] target/s390x: Implement the MVPG condition-code-option bit
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 13:32:48 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0

On 03/03/2021 12.40, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 03.03.21 12:36, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 03/03/2021 07.25, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 03/03/2021 03.44, Richard Henderson wrote:
If the CCO bit is set, MVPG should not generate an exception but
report page translation faults via a CC code.

Create a new helper, access_prepare_nf, which can use probe_access_flags
in non-faulting mode, and then handle watchpoints.

Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
   target/s390x/mem_helper.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
   1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/mem_helper.c b/target/s390x/mem_helper.c
index 25cfede806..b397333c0b 100644
--- a/target/s390x/mem_helper.c
+++ b/target/s390x/mem_helper.c
@@ -130,28 +130,62 @@ typedef struct S390Access {
       int mmu_idx;
   } S390Access;
+static bool access_prepare_nf(S390Access *access, CPUS390XState *env,
+                              bool nofault, vaddr vaddr1, int size,
+                              MMUAccessType access_type,
+                              int mmu_idx, uintptr_t ra)
+{
+    void *haddr1, *haddr2 = NULL;
+    int size1, size2;
+    vaddr vaddr2 = 0;
+    int flags;
+
+    assert(size > 0 && size <= 4096);
+
+    size1 = MIN(size, -(vaddr1 | TARGET_PAGE_MASK)),
+    size2 = size - size1;
+
+    flags = probe_access_flags(env, vaddr1, access_type, mmu_idx,
+                               nofault, &haddr1, ra);
+    if (unlikely(size2)) {
+        /* The access crosses page boundaries. */
+        vaddr2 = wrap_address(env, vaddr1 + size1);
+        flags |= probe_access_flags(env, vaddr2, access_type, mmu_idx,
+                                    nofault, &haddr2, ra);
+    }
+
+    if (unlikely(flags & TLB_INVALID_MASK)) {
+        return false;
+    }
+    if (unlikely(flags & TLB_WATCHPOINT)) {
+        /* S390 does not presently use transaction attributes. */
+        cpu_check_watchpoint(env_cpu(env), vaddr1, size,
+                             MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED,
+                             (access_type == MMU_DATA_STORE
+                              ? BP_MEM_WRITE : BP_MEM_READ), ra);
+    }
+
+    *access = (S390Access) {
+        .vaddr1 = vaddr1,
+        .vaddr2 = vaddr2,
+        .haddr1 = haddr1,
+        .haddr2 = haddr2,
+        .size1 = size1,
+        .size2 = size2,
+        .mmu_idx = mmu_idx
+    };
+    return true;
+}
+
   static S390Access access_prepare(CPUS390XState *env, vaddr vaddr, int size,
                                    MMUAccessType access_type, int mmu_idx,
                                    uintptr_t ra)
   {
-    S390Access access = {
-        .vaddr1 = vaddr,
-        .size1 = MIN(size, -(vaddr | TARGET_PAGE_MASK)),
-        .mmu_idx = mmu_idx,
-    };
-
-    g_assert(size > 0 && size <= 4096);
-    access.haddr1 = probe_access(env, access.vaddr1, access.size1,
access_type,
-                                 mmu_idx, ra);
-
-    if (unlikely(access.size1 != size)) {
-        /* The access crosses page boundaries. */
-        access.vaddr2 = wrap_address(env, vaddr + access.size1);
-        access.size2 = size - access.size1;
-        access.haddr2 = probe_access(env, access.vaddr2, access.size2,
-                                     access_type, mmu_idx, ra);
-    }
-    return access;
+    S390Access ret;
+    bool ok = access_prepare_nf(&ret, env, false, vaddr, size,
+                                access_type, mmu_idx, ra);
+    assert(ok);
+    return ret;
   }
   /* Helper to handle memset on a single page. */
@@ -845,8 +879,10 @@ uint32_t HELPER(mvpg)(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t
r0, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r2)
       const int mmu_idx = cpu_mmu_index(env, false);
       const bool f = extract64(r0, 11, 1);
       const bool s = extract64(r0, 10, 1);
+    const bool cco = extract64(r0, 8, 1);
       uintptr_t ra = GETPC();
       S390Access srca, desta;
+    bool ok;
       if ((f && s) || extract64(r0, 12, 4)) {
           tcg_s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, GETPC());
@@ -858,13 +894,18 @@ uint32_t HELPER(mvpg)(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t
r0, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r2)
       /*
        * TODO:
        * - Access key handling
-     * - CC-option with surpression of page-translation exceptions
        * - Store r1/r2 register identifiers at real location 162
        */
-    srca = access_prepare(env, r2, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE, MMU_DATA_LOAD, mmu_idx,
-                          ra);
-    desta = access_prepare(env, r1, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE, MMU_DATA_STORE,
mmu_idx,
-                           ra);
+    ok = access_prepare_nf(&srca, env, cco, r2, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE,
+                           MMU_DATA_LOAD, mmu_idx, ra);
+    if (!ok) {
+        return 2;
+    }
+    ok = access_prepare_nf(&desta, env, cco, r1, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE,
+                           MMU_DATA_STORE, mmu_idx, ra);
+    if (!ok) {
+        return 1;
+    }

Thanks, this looks promising, but one of the MVPG kvm-unit-tests is still
failing with this patch - the one that checks for an exception if the
destination page is marked as read-only. MVPG only returns CC1 for invalid
page table entries - but if the page is write-protected, it still causes a
protection exception. That's why I've been checking "if (exc && exc !=
PGM_PROTECTION)" in my version of the patch.

FWIW, I can get the MVPG kvm-unit-test working with your patch if I add
this on top:

diff a/target/s390x/mem_helper.c b/target/s390x/mem_helper.c
--- a/target/s390x/mem_helper.c
+++ b/target/s390x/mem_helper.c
@@ -904,7 +904,14 @@ uint32_t HELPER(mvpg)(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r0, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r2)
       ok = access_prepare_nf(&desta, env, cco, r1, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE,
                              MMU_DATA_STORE, mmu_idx, ra);
       if (!ok) {
-        return 1;
+        ok = access_prepare_nf(&desta, env, cco, r1, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE,
+                               MMU_DATA_LOAD, mmu_idx, ra);
+        if (!ok) {
+            return 1;
+        }
+        /* If reading was ok, then the page must be protected. */
+        /* TODO: Set a translation exception code in lowcore? */
+        tcg_s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_PROTECTION, ra);
       }
       access_memmove(env, &desta, &srca, ra);
       return 0; /* data moved */

... yeah, it's ugly to call access_prepare_nf() again with MMU_DATA_LOAD,
and it's still missing the translation exception code ... but at least
the kvm-unit-test is happy that way...

As I said, can't we store the last exception we had during tlb_fill and use that in case returns access_prepare_nf() returns an error to identify the actual exception?

Ah, right, thanks. That's likely the best way to do it. I just gave it a try and it seems to work ... I'll send out that modified versions as a v4...

 Thomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]