qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 14/39] tests/functional: require non-NULL success_message for


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/39] tests/functional: require non-NULL success_message for console wait
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 20:24:44 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 21/11/2024 17.57, Alex Bennée wrote:
From: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>

When waiting for expected output, the 'success_message' is a mandatory
parameter, with 'failure_message' defaulting to None.

The code has logic which indicates it was trying to cope with
'success_message' being None and 'failure_message' being non-None but
it does not appear able to actually do anything useful. The check for
'success_message is None' will break out of the loop before any check
for 'failure_message' has been performed.

IOW, for practcal purposes 'success_message' must be non-None unless
'send_string' is set. Assert this expectation and simplify the loop
logic.

Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20241121154218.1423005-15-berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
---
  tests/functional/qemu_test/cmd.py | 9 +++++++--
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/functional/qemu_test/cmd.py 
b/tests/functional/qemu_test/cmd.py
index 98722a9cf6..f6c4e4dda1 100644
--- a/tests/functional/qemu_test/cmd.py
+++ b/tests/functional/qemu_test/cmd.py
@@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ def is_readable_executable_file(path):
  def _console_interaction(test, success_message, failure_message,
                           send_string, keep_sending=False, vm=None):
      assert not keep_sending or send_string
+    assert success_message or send_string
+
      if vm is None:
          vm = test.vm
      console = vm.console_file
@@ -95,7 +97,7 @@ def _console_interaction(test, success_message, 
failure_message,
                  send_string = None # send only once
# Only consume console output if waiting for something
-        if success_message is None and failure_message is None:
+        if success_message is None:
              if send_string is None:
                  break
              continue
@@ -107,7 +109,7 @@ def _console_interaction(test, success_message, 
failure_message,
          if not msg:
              continue
          console_logger.debug(msg)
-        if success_message is None or success_message in msg:
+        if success_message in msg:
              break
          if failure_message and failure_message in msg:
              console.close()
@@ -138,6 +140,7 @@ def interrupt_interactive_console_until_pattern(test, 
success_message,
      :param interrupt_string: a string to send to the console before trying
                               to read a new line
      """
+    assert success_message
      _console_interaction(test, success_message, failure_message,
                           interrupt_string, True)
@@ -152,6 +155,7 @@ def wait_for_console_pattern(test, success_message, failure_message=None,
      :param success_message: if this message appears, test succeeds
      :param failure_message: if this message appears, test fails
      """
+    assert success_message
      _console_interaction(test, success_message, failure_message, None, vm=vm)

This assert is theoretically not needed since we call _console_interaction with send_string=None, so if success_message is None, the new assert in _console_interaction would trigger instead.

But it also does not hurt to have it here, so fine for me if we keep it.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]