qemu-stable
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] numa: properly check if numa is supported


From: Tao Xu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] numa: properly check if numa is supported
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 09:33:10 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1

On 12/12/2019 8:48 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
Commit aa57020774b, by mistake used MachineClass::numa_mem_supported
to check if NUMA is supported by machine and also as unrelated change
set it to true for sbsa-ref board.

Luckily change didn't break machines that support NUMA, as the field
is set to true for them.

But the field is not intended for checking if NUMA is supported and
will be flipped to false within this release for new machine types.

Fix it:
  - by using previously used condition
       !mc->cpu_index_to_instance_props || !mc->get_default_cpu_node_id
    the first time and then use MachineState::numa_state down the road
    to check if NUMA is supported
  - dropping stray sbsa-ref chunk

Fixes: aa57020774b690a22be72453b8e91c9b5a68c516
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
---
CC: Radoslaw Biernacki <address@hidden>
CC: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
CC: Leif Lindholm <address@hidden>
CC: address@hidden
CC: address@hidden


  hw/arm/sbsa-ref.c | 1 -
  hw/core/machine.c | 4 ++--
  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/arm/sbsa-ref.c b/hw/arm/sbsa-ref.c
index 27046cc..c6261d4 100644
--- a/hw/arm/sbsa-ref.c
+++ b/hw/arm/sbsa-ref.c
@@ -791,7 +791,6 @@ static void sbsa_ref_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
      mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids = sbsa_ref_possible_cpu_arch_ids;
      mc->cpu_index_to_instance_props = sbsa_ref_cpu_index_to_props;
      mc->get_default_cpu_node_id = sbsa_ref_get_default_cpu_node_id;
-    mc->numa_mem_supported = true;
  }
static const TypeInfo sbsa_ref_info = {
diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
index 1689ad3..aa63231 100644
--- a/hw/core/machine.c
+++ b/hw/core/machine.c
@@ -958,7 +958,7 @@ static void machine_initfn(Object *obj)
                                          NULL);
      }
- if (mc->numa_mem_supported) {
+    if (mc->cpu_index_to_instance_props && mc->get_default_cpu_node_id) {
          ms->numa_state = g_new0(NumaState, 1);
      }

I am wondering if @numa_mem_supported is unused here, it is unused for QEMU, because the only usage of @numa_mem_supported is to initialize @numa_state. Or there is other usage? So should it be removed from struct MachineClass?





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]