qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] serial-pci: Set prog interface f


From: BALATON Zoltan
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] serial-pci: Set prog interface field of pci config to 16550 compatible
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 18:44:14 +0100 (CET)
User-agent: Alpine 2.02 (LMD 1266 2009-07-14)

On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Michael Tokarev wrote:
10.03.2014 22:40, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Ping!
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/324674/

On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <address@hidden>
---
hw/char/serial-pci.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/hw/char/serial-pci.c b/hw/char/serial-pci.c
index 991c99f..e662b77 100644
--- a/hw/char/serial-pci.c
+++ b/hw/char/serial-pci.c
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ static int serial_pci_init(PCIDevice *dev)
        return -1;
    }

+    pci->dev.config[PCI_CLASS_PROG] = 0x02; /* 16550 compatible */
    pci->dev.config[PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN] = 0x01;
    s->irq = pci_allocate_irq(&pci->dev);

Hm. While this is an one-liner indeed, I'm not sure it's the right
value.  From my pci.ids:

C 07  Communication controller
       00  Serial controller
               00  8250
               01  16450
               02  16550
               03  16650
               04  16750
               05  16850
               06  16950

so it seems correct thing to do.

What about multi_serial_pci_init() -- should it too set prog-if
like this?

I'm not completely sure what the correct value should be for multi_serial_pci_init so I've left that alone. There's also 07 02 00 that means multiport serial controller that might apply for that case. For the simple case I've sent the patch for I had a client expecting this value so I think it is correct for that at least but I don't know about the multiport case.

Regards,
BALATON Zoltan



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]