qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] scripts: qom-*: add network


From: Andreas Färber
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] scripts: qom-*: add network syntax
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 16:23:29 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0

Am 19.05.2015 um 16:17 schrieb Eric Blake:
> On 05/19/2015 08:12 AM, Martin Cerveny wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> On Tue, 19 May 2015, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> On 05/19/2015 06:51 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>>> Am 13.05.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Martin Cerveny:
>>>>> Add network syntax parsing (ip address, port) to qom-* scripts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Cerveny <address@hidden>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  scripts/qmp/qom-fuse |   13 ++++++++++++-
>>>>>  scripts/qmp/qom-get  |   12 +++++++++++-
>>>>>  scripts/qmp/qom-list |   12 +++++++++++-
>>>>>  scripts/qmp/qom-set  |   12 +++++++++++-
>>>>>  scripts/qmp/qom-tree |   12 +++++++++++-
>>>>>  5 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> Could some Python guru please take a look at this?
> 
>>>>> +if len(connection) == 2:
>>>>> +    try:
>>>>> +         port = int(connection[1])
>>>>> +    except ValueError:
>>>>> +         raise QMPBadPort
>>>>> +    connection = ( connection[0], port )
>>>
>>> Won't that mishandle IPv6 connections, such as something like [::1]:8000
>>> for connecting to port 8000 on localhost, since it splits into more than
>>> 2 pieces when splitting on :?
>>
>> Yes, this is problem, but I copy-paste the same construct from
>> scripts/qmp/qmp-shell to be compatible.
> 
> Might be worth mentioning that, as justification in the commit message.
> 
>> Is the IPv6 support for utilities mandatory ?
> 
> I don't have any strong feelings about it (I'm okay if you don't).  But
> others might.
> 
>> If yes I can make V2.
> 
> If so, it would be good to fix qmp-shell, too - which makes it sound
> like it would be a separate commit.

Is there a chance this can be fixed in a way that we don't need to
replicate that code? :)

Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton; HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]