|
From: | Shannon Zhao |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH 0/7] virtio: inline private qdev properties into virtio devices |
Date: | Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:28:21 +0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 |
On 2015/6/10 22:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Yeah, and I ask whether it needs to repin. Could you help deal the indentations?On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 09:38:24PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:On 2015/6/10 21:21, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 09:18:27PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:Ping? Have these patches been missed?I see them upstream. See e.g. da3e8a23492dbc13c4b70d90b6ae42970624e63a. What's missing?da3e8a23492dbc13c4b70d90b6ae42970624e63a is "virtio-net: Move DEFINE_VIRTIO_NET_FEATURES to virtio-net", not this patchset.Oh right, I just saw Cornelia sent a minor comment which wasn't addressed.
Also, I'd rather this is rebased on top of Gerd's virtio 1 tree - I plan to merge them today.
I pull master, apply Gerd's virtio-1 patchset "[PATCH 00/33] virtio 1.0 patch series rebased", then apply these patches. No conflicts and compile pass. I guess you could apply these directly.
PS: The [PATCH 01/33] of Gerd's virtio-1 patchset is already in master. Thanks, -- Shannon
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |